Contextual effects on the LSS implementation in networked service environments

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the contingency effects that contextual factors of a networked service environment have on the phased Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation frameworks. Design/methodology/approach This paper employs the critical realism (CR) case study research methodology to examine the contingent and causal relationships between contextual configurations of business networks, the DMAIC or PDCA phases in an LSS implementation agenda, and business management functions. The authors conducted a single case study on the basis of challenges they met in kicking off lean transportation in the Port of Houston. Findings The key finding from the study is a mid-range theory regarding the contingency effects of contextual factors of service business networks on the phased LSS implementation frameworks. The authors found that when there are complexity and dynamics of contextual factors at the field layer, management should focus more on tasks in early LSS phases to emphasize influencing. When there is no centralized authority in the network and the value-system is loosely coupled, management needs to execute more tasks as described in the define, measure and analyze phases with the purpose of both influencing and orchestrating. When individual actors have goals not aligned well with the goal of the business network and have unmatched operations capabilities, these factors should be considered as early as possible in these LSS phases. When a business network has complicated business processes with high unpredictability and uncertainty and individual actors’ value-creation systems are not well embedded in the entire value-creation system, PDCA will be the preferred core structure of an LSS implementation agenda. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to the LSS research stream by introducing a causal/contingency model that prescribes the contingency effects of three contextual configurations on LSS implementation. It also contributes to the emerging discipline, business network management, regarding how to use LSS frameworks in strategic planning. It also contributes to the CR school of problem-driven case study by using a strategic initiative framework as a platform and each phase in the framework as a unit. This conceptualization of the entity of interest helps explore the interactions among three theoretical constructs: contextual configurations, phased LSS implementation agenda and management functions. Practical implications Managerial implications of this study are twofold. One is the procedure of analyzing the impacts of contextual factors on the causal relationships between LSS implementation phases and network management functions. The entire procedure represents the agenda-setting process of LSS implementation, the most daunting and challenging managerial task in LSS projects. Another one is the guideline on how to determine whether DMAIC or PDCA is appropriate for the LSS agenda when used in a networked environment. Originality/value This paper would serve as an excellent resource for both academicians and LSS practitioners in initiating, orchestrating and managing an LSS project in a networked service environment. This study represents the first effort to explore the impact of contextual factors of business networks on lean transformation.

[1]  K. Möller,et al.  Business Relationships and Networks: Managerial Challenge of Network Era , 1999 .

[2]  Torbjørn H. Netland,et al.  Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies , 2015 .

[3]  Lars Witell,et al.  Reflections on context in service research , 2016 .

[4]  Manoj K. Malhotra,et al.  Toward a theory of managing context in Six Sigma process-improvement projects: An action research investigation , 2011 .

[5]  J. Gerring What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for? , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[6]  K. Möller Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging business networks — How to direct radical innovation , 2010 .

[7]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[8]  P. Hines,et al.  Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinking , 2004 .

[9]  G. Easton Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .

[10]  Shankar Ganesan Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1994 .

[11]  A. Roth,et al.  INSIGHTS INTO SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: A RESEARCH AGENDA , 2003 .

[12]  Carola Wolf,et al.  Strategic Planning Research: Toward a Theory-Driven Agenda , 2017 .

[13]  S. Afshin Mansouri,et al.  The lean-performance relationship in services: a theoretical model , 2014 .

[14]  Jeroen de Mast,et al.  A rational reconstruction of Six Sigma's Breakthrough Cookbook , 2006 .

[15]  Maciej Mitrega,et al.  Capabilities in business relationships and networks: Research recommendations and directions , 2018, Industrial Marketing Management.

[16]  Farhad Nabhani,et al.  Investigating the readiness of people in manufacturing SMEs to embark on Lean Six Sigma projects: An empirical study in the German manufacturing sector , 2016 .

[17]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[18]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  An instrument for assessing lean service adoption , 2013 .

[19]  Pietro Romano,et al.  ‘Lean first, then automate’: a framework for process improvement in pure service companies. A case study , 2012 .

[20]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[21]  Abdur Rahim,et al.  The integration of Six Sigma and lean management , 2010 .

[22]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Critical success factors for the effective implementation of Lean Sigma , 2012 .

[23]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Six Sigma adoption: Operating performance impacts and contextual drivers of success , 2012 .

[24]  Arvind Parkhe,et al.  Orchestrating Innovation Networks , 2006 .

[25]  Marcus Assarlind,et al.  Multi‐faceted views on a Lean Six Sigma application , 2012 .

[26]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review , 2014 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[28]  Alexandros G. Psychogios,et al.  Towards an integrated framework for Lean Six Sigma application: Lessons from the airline industry , 2012 .

[29]  K. Möller,et al.  Managing business and innovation networks—From strategic nets to business fields and ecosystems , 2017 .

[30]  A. Dubois,et al.  “Systematic combining”—A decade later , 2014 .

[31]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow , 2017 .

[32]  K. Soh,et al.  The perceptions and perspectives of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) practitioners: An empirical study in Malaysia , 2012 .

[33]  R. Duncan Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[34]  Joseph Ofori-Dankwa,et al.  Context matters: Diversity's short‐ and long‐term effects in fortune's “best companies to work for” , 2017 .

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[36]  Roger Hoerl,et al.  Lean Six Sigma, creativity, and innovation , 2010 .

[37]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Lean Six Sigma – getting better all the time , 2010 .

[38]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change , 2012 .

[39]  K. Weick The Generative Properties Of Richness , 2007 .

[40]  Nitin Seth,et al.  Application of value stream mapping (VSM) for minimization of wastes in the processing side of supply chain of cottonseed oil industry in Indian context , 2008 .

[41]  Rachna Shah,et al.  In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of Lean and Six Sigma , 2008 .

[42]  Moacir Godinho Filho,et al.  Lean healthcare: review, classification and analysis of literature , 2016 .

[43]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Managing in complex business networks , 2004 .

[44]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  Sustainability of process improvements: an application of the experiential learning model (ELM) , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[45]  Douglas P. Mader,et al.  Lean Six Sigma's Evolution , 2008 .

[46]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[47]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[48]  Katy Mason,et al.  Managing to make markets:Marketization and the conceptualization work of strategic nets in the life science sector , 2017 .

[49]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[50]  Trevor A Spedding,et al.  The evolution of lean Six Sigma , 2010 .

[51]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[52]  Donald E. Wynn,et al.  Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2012, MIS Q..

[53]  Loukas Tsironis,et al.  Lean Six Sigma in a service context , 2012 .

[54]  Rodolfo de Castro,et al.  Extent of the use of Lean concepts proposed for a value stream mapping application , 2009 .

[55]  H. Håkansson,et al.  No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy , 1989 .

[56]  Jeanne Nickerson Chircop On the Same Page , 2008 .

[57]  C. Voss,et al.  QUALITY MANAGEMENT: UNIVERSAL OR CONTEXT DEPENDENT? , 2001 .

[58]  Asokan Thondiyath,et al.  Combining Lean and Six Sigma in the context of Systems Engineering design , 2015 .

[59]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Six sigma for service processes , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[60]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[61]  Kuldip Singh Sangwan,et al.  Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues , 2014 .

[62]  Okan Duru,et al.  ‘Maritime transport in regional context, governance and environmental phenomenon’ , 2018, Maritime Policy & Management.

[63]  Ping Wang,et al.  Untangling process complexity in logistics delivery services with unpredictable service sequences: a mixed-method study of chemical tanker port calls , 2018, Maritime Policy & Management.