Assessment of alkali activated mortars based on different precursors with regard to their suitability for concrete repair

Abstract The implementation of repair works on concrete structures is on the increase since many existing concrete buildings have been exposed for long periods of time to different climates, as well as to other severe conditions, and have consequently deteriorated. Repair mortars need to fulfil the requirements of the EN 1504 series before being used in practice. Different mixtures, based on three different precursors (fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, and metakaolin) and processed by alkali activated technology, have been assessed with regard to their suitability for the repair of concrete. Whereas the slag-based repair mortar delaminated from the substrate, and was thus unsuitable for its intended use, the other two mortars which were based on the precursors fly ash and metakaolin exhibited good mechanical properties and good adhesion. The bond strength of the metakaolin and fly ash mortars ranged from 1.8 to 2.3 N/mm 2 , and thus met these criteria for both structural and non-structural repair mortars. The capillary absorption of all three mixtures was too high to fulfil the criteria of EN 1504-3 for structural repair products, but the fly ash and metakaolin mixtures still have the potential to be used for non-structural repair works. The problem of efflorescence in all three mixtures was also assessed.

[1]  Amândio Teixeira-Pinto,et al.  Repairing of Damaged Stone in Monuments and Stone Buildings , 2010 .

[2]  Konrad Zehnder,et al.  Crystal growth in salt efflorescence , 1989 .

[3]  Kwesi Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures , 2007 .

[4]  Lubomír Kopecký,et al.  ALUMINOSILICATE POLYMERS - INFLUENCE OF ELEVATED TEMPERATURES, EFFLORESCENCE , 2009 .

[5]  S. Sufian,et al.  Effect of Na/Al and Si/Al Ratios on Adhesion Strength of Geopolymers as Coating Material , 2014 .

[6]  John L. Provis,et al.  Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement , 2012 .

[7]  A. Balbo,et al.  Mechanical Performances and Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortars , 2014 .

[8]  Pradip Nath,et al.  The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature , 2014 .

[9]  A. Scott,et al.  Durability properties of inorganic polymer concrete using fly ash and slag , 2012 .

[10]  Prabir Sarker,et al.  Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition , 2014 .

[11]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Engineering Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Concrete , 2006 .

[12]  Mark Williamson.  Space glamour moves east , 2010 .

[13]  P. Taneerananon,et al.  Development and Performance Evaluation of Very High Early Strength Geopolymer for Rapid Road Repair , 2013 .

[14]  E. Allouche,et al.  Factors affecting the suitability of fly ash as source material for geopolymers , 2010 .

[15]  Hao Wang,et al.  Efflorescence: a critical challenge for geopolymer applications? , 2013 .

[16]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment , 2008 .

[17]  A. K. Parande,et al.  Deterioration of reinforced concrete in sewer environments , 2006 .

[18]  T. Cheng,et al.  Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag , 2003 .

[19]  X. Querol,et al.  Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  S. Baklouti,et al.  Effect of the reactivity of alkaline solution and metakaolin on geopolymer formation , 2015 .

[21]  E. Samson,et al.  Durability of concrete — Degradation phenomena involving detrimental chemical reactions , 2008 .

[22]  W. Yodsudjai.  Application of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer for Structural Member and Repair Materials , 2014 .

[23]  C. Andrade,et al.  Recent durability studies on concrete structure , 2015 .

[24]  J. L. Barroso de Aguiar,et al.  Performance of alkali-activated mortars for the repair and strengthening of OPC concrete , 2015 .

[25]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali activation of fly ash: Effect of the SiO2/Na2O ratio Part I: FTIR study , 2007 .

[26]  Hao Wang,et al.  Fly ash-based geopolymers: The relationship between composition, pore structure and efflorescence , 2014 .

[27]  H. M. Shalaby,et al.  Case studies of deterioration of coastal concrete structures in two oil refineries in the Arabian Gulf region , 1990 .

[28]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Durability of Geopolymer Materials in Sodium and Magnesium Sulfate Solutions , 2005 .

[29]  T. Bakharev,et al.  Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack , 2005 .

[30]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  An overview on the potential of geopolymers for concrete infrastructure rehabilitation , 2012 .

[31]  S. P. Mehrotra,et al.  Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer , 2010, Journal of Materials Science.