A discussion on and alternative to the Penman-Monteith equation.

Abstract The Penman–Monteith (PMe) equation that estimates evaporation from leaf/canopy surfaces is based on a few approximations. Several authors discussed ensuing errors and suggested improvements. This paper reminds those discussions which ended in the early nineties. It compares linearized PMe− with non-linear iterative solutions and illustrates resulting deviations. It differentiates between deviations for daily and hourly evaporation rate estimates. The latter are found to be higher. It also demonstrates deviations obtained at two different altitudes above sea level. Considering present tendencies to refine evaporation estimates for practical purposes and making use of easily available methods for solving non-linear equations this paper offers a new method to estimate evaporation. In a first step, a simple algebraic term, the surface temperature control sum, is introduced to find approximate differences between air and evaporating surface (leaf, canopy) temperatures. It suggests to concentrate research on the rs/ra ratio. A new formula is derived for estimating leaf/canopy surface temperatures for non-water stressed plants. In a second step, the estimates of temperature differences are used to calculate evaporation estimates. This two-step approximation leads to appreciably smaller errors as compared to the PMe-solution over the full range of input parameters of agro-meteorological relevance. It is, however, less accurate than some of methods proposed in literature. The method is meant for practical application in agricultural water management.

[1]  H. Gavin,et al.  Modelling actual, reference and equilibrium evaporation from a temperate wet grassland , 2004 .

[2]  R. Jackson.  Canopy Temperature and Crop Water Stress , 1982 .

[3]  W. Klaassen.  Evaporation From rain‐wetted forest in relation to canopy wetness, canopy cover, and net radiation , 2001 .

[4]  J. Lhomme.  Stomatal control of transpiration: Examination of the Jarvis‐type representation of canopy resistance in relation to humidity , 2001 .

[5]  A. S. Thom,et al.  Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation , 1972 .

[6]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[7]  R. Huey,et al.  Errors resulting from linear approximations in energy balance equations , 1984 .

[8]  U. KyawThaPaw,et al.  Applications of solutions to non-linear energy budget equations , 1988 .

[9]  G. A. D. Medeiros,et al.  Crop coefficient for irrigated beans derived using three reference evaporation methods , 2005 .

[10]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[11]  H. Jones,et al.  Plants and Microclimate. , 1985 .

[12]  D.R Grant.  Comparison of evaporation from barley with Penman estimates , 1975 .

[13]  G. Fogg.  The state and movement of water in living organisms. , 1966, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[14]  K. M. King,et al.  Evaporation from land surfaces , 1961 .

[15]  Norman J. Rosenberg,et al.  A Resistance Model to Predict Evapotranspiration and Its Application to a Sugar Beet Field1 , 1973 .

[16]  Nader Katerji,et al.  Evapotranspiration of sweet sorghum: A general model and multilocal validity in semiarid environmental conditions , 2001 .

[17]  F. W. Murray,et al.  On the Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure , 1967 .

[18]  F. W. Kellaway,et al.  Advanced Engineering Mathematics , 1969, The Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  P. Kerkides,et al.  New empirical formula for hourly estimations of reference evapotranspiration , 2003 .

[20]  P. Stahl.  Feuchtigkeit und Trocknen in der pharmazeutischen Technologie , 1980 .

[21]  U Paw,et al.  A discussion of the Penman form equations and comparisons of some equations to estimate latent energy flux density , 1992 .

[22]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration , 2005 .

[23]  Richard G. Allen,et al.  A Penman for All Seasons , 1986 .

[24]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  S. Lecina,et al.  A simple parameterization of bulk canopy resistance from climatic variables for estimating hourly evapotranspiration , 2006 .

[26]  F. Villalobos,et al.  Fixed versus variable bulk canopy resistance for reference evapotranspiration estimation using the Penman–Monteith equation under semiarid conditions , 2003 .

[27]  H. L. Penman,et al.  Vegetation and hydrology , 1963 .

[28]  C. Batchelor.  The accuracy of evapotranspiration estimated with the FAO modified penman equation , 1984, Irrigation Science.

[29]  S. Idso,et al.  Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator , 1981 .

[30]  P. Milly.  A refinement of the combination equations for evaporation , 1991 .

[31]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method , 2006 .

[32]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Variability in surface energy flux partitioning during Washita '92 : Resulting effects on Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor parameters , 1996 .

[33]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Comparison of seven models for estimation of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge using lysimeter measurement data in Germany , 2005 .

[34]  R. López-Urrea,et al.  An evaluation of two hourly reference evapotranspiration equations for semiarid conditions , 2006 .

[35]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Non-water-stressed baselines for irrigation scheduling with infrared thermometers: A new approach , 2000, Irrigation Science.