Development of a new generation of area detectors for portal imaging: high-quantum-efficiency direct-conversion MV flat-panel imagers

Recently developed flat-panel detectors have been proven to have a much better image quality than conventional electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiation therapy. They are, however, not yet ideal for portal imaging application primarily due to the low x-ray absorption for megavoltage(MV) x-rays, i.e., low quantum efficiency (QE), typically on the order of 2-4% as compared to the theoretical limit of 100%. A significant increase of QE is desirable for applications such as MV cone-beam computed tomography (MVCT) and MV fluoroscopy. Our goal is to develop a new generation of area detectors for radiotherapy treatment verification, with a QE an order of magnitude higher than that of current flat-panel systems and an equivalent spatial resolution. In this paper, we will first discuss the rationale and the challenges in designing a high QE detector for portal imaging application and give an overview of previous designs and their limitations. We will then introduce our novel design for a high QE detector, which has a thick, dense x-ray direct-conversion layer coupled to a 2D active matrix for image storage and readout. The conversion layer is made of high-density metal elements to convert x-rays to electrons and sub-pixel sized cavities filled with an ionization medium (e.g., gas or a-Se) to convert the electrons to free charges that are collected on electrodes connected to the active matrix. The QE, spatial resolution, and sensitivity of the proposed detector have been modeled, and results will be presented. It is shown that this new detector will be quantum noise limited and have both a high QE and a high resolution. Thus, further development based on this novel design is warranted.

[1]  B. Fallone,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of a direct-detection active matrix flat panel imager at megavoltage energies. , 2001, Medical physics.

[2]  T. Mackie,et al.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  P. Munro,et al.  X-ray quantum limited portal imaging using amorphous silicon flat-panel arrays. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Development of thin-film flat-panel arrays for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[5]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  T Haycocks,et al.  Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  J. Kimura,et al.  A new anisotropic conductive film with arrayed conductive particles , 1996 .

[8]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  Development of a new multielement detector system for megavoltage photons , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Mats Danielsson,et al.  Novel detector for portal imaging in radiation therapy , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Carlo Tognina,et al.  Megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography using a high-efficiency image receptor. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  L. Antonuk Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  H. Sipila The Statistics of Gas Gain in Penning Mixtures , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.

[15]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Rowlands,et al.  Investigation of a direct conversion flat panel imager for portal imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[17]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Imaging of 1.0-mm-diameter radiopaque markers with megavoltage X-rays: an improved online imaging system. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  S. Webb,et al.  Rapid portal imaging with a high-efficiency, large field-of-view detector. , 1998, Medical physics.

[19]  H. Zeman,et al.  Theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation of a Csl(TI) based electronic portal imaging system. , 2002, Medical physics.