So-called prediction markets have emerged as an alternative to expertise in a range of fields: from predicting the outcome of political elections to selecting among alternative plans for product development, to finding shipwrecks, and predicting Oscar Award winners. Proponents of these markets argue that their use can be expanded to an even wider range of cultural, political, and social events, and thus to serve as guides for choosing among policy alternatives. This article argues that prediction markets serve as a means for addressing the impasses of generalized savvy skepticism—what it dubs a form of vernacular postmodernism. Prediction markets offer to replace debunked forms of expertise while cultivating a populace trained in practices of speculation and risk assessment. Finally, the article considers the uncanny persistence of faith in markets even in the midst of the global economic downturn—apparent evidence of the dramatic failure of speculative markets.
[1]
B. Latour.
Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern
,
2004,
Critical Inquiry.
[2]
Koleman Strumpf,et al.
Historical presidential betting markets
,
2004
.
[3]
S. Žižek.
Against the Populist Temptation
,
2006,
Critical Inquiry.
[4]
M. Dean,et al.
Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society
,
1999
.
[5]
S. Žižek.
The sublime object of ideology
,
1989
.
[6]
S. Turkle.
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
,
1997
.
[7]
Michael Lewis,et al.
The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine
,
2010
.
[8]
S. Žižek.
The indivisible remainder : an essay on Schelling and related matters
,
1996
.
[9]
K. Kraco.
A ticklish subject.
,
2004,
Minnesota medicine.