Imaging of multiple reflections

Current multiple-removal algorithms in seismic processing use either differential moveout or predictability. If the differential moveout between primaries and multiples is small, prediction is the only option available. In the last decade, multidimensional prediction-error filtering by weighted convolution, such as surface-related multiple elimination (SRME), have proved to be very successful in practice. So far, multiples have been considered as noise and have been discarded after the removal process. In this paper, we argue that multiple reflections contain a wealth of information that can be used in seismic processing to improve the resolution of reservoir images beyond current capability. In the near future, one may expect that the so-called weighted-crosscorrelation (WCC) concept may offer an attractive alternative in approaching the multiple problem. WCC creates an option to avoid the adaptive subtraction process as applied in prediction-error algorithms. Moreover, it allows the transformation of multiples into primaries. The latter means that seismic imaging with primaries and multiples (nonlinear process) can be implemented by a sequence of linear processes, including the transformation of multiples into primaries and the imaging of primaries.

[1]  Sven Treitel,et al.  Geophysical Signal Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  E. Robinson PREDICTIVE DECOMPOSITION OF SEISMIC TRACES , 1957 .

[3]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Angle-dependent reflectivity by means of prestack migration , 1990 .

[4]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination , 1992 .

[5]  Dan Hampson,et al.  Inverse Velocity Stacking For Multiple Elimination , 1986 .

[6]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Relations between reflection and transmission responses of three-dimensional inhomogeneous media , 2004 .

[7]  R. Romijn Reconstruction of seismic data using the Focal Transformation , 2004 .

[8]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Surface-Related Multiple Elimination:Application On Real Data , 1991 .

[9]  Arthur B. Weglein,et al.  An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data , 1997 .

[10]  Luc T. Ikelle,et al.  Noniterative multiple attenuation methods Linear inverse solutions to nonlinear inverse problems , 2002 .

[11]  W.E.A. Rietveld Controlled Illumination in Prestack Seismic Migration , 1995 .

[12]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion; Part II, Practical aspects and examples , 1997 .

[13]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Surface-related multiple elimination, an inversion approach , 1991 .

[14]  A. J. Berkhout Pushing the limits of seismic imaging, Part I: Prestack migration in terms of double dynamic focusing , 1997 .

[15]  O. K. Youn,et al.  Depth imaging with multiples , 2001 .

[16]  Helmut Jakubowicz Wave Equation Prediction And Removal of Interbed Multiples , 1998 .

[17]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wave Field Extrapolation , 1980 .

[18]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, Part I: Theoretical considerations , 1997 .

[19]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Acoustic daylight imaging via spectral factorization: helioseismology and reservoir monitoring , 1999 .

[20]  Philippe Herrmann,et al.  De-aliased, High-Resolution Radon Transforms , 2000 .

[21]  Simon Spitz Model-based Subtraction of Multiple Events In the Frequency-space Domain , 2000 .

[22]  Robert L. Clark,et al.  Data-driven internal multiple attenuation - Applications and issues on land data , 2002 .

[23]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Synthesis of a layered medium from its acoustic transmission response , 1968 .

[24]  M. Nafi Toksöz,et al.  Imaging with deep‐water multiples , 1991 .

[25]  A. Guitton,et al.  Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the L1‐norm , 2004 .

[26]  Jan Thorbecke,et al.  Common focus point technology , 1997 .

[27]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Surface‐related multiple elimination on land seismic data—Strategies via case studies , 2000 .

[28]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Minimum Energy Adaptive Subtraction In Surface-related Multiple Attenuation , 1998 .

[29]  G. Nolet Book reviewSeismic migration. Imaging of acoustic energy by wavefield extrapolation. A: theoretical aspects: A.J. Berkhout. Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics, 14A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982, 2nd revised , 1985 .

[30]  A. Berkhout A unified approach to acoustical reflection imaging. I: The forward model , 1993 .

[31]  Scott Michell,et al.  Optimizing surface-related multiple elimination on a synthetic subsalt data set , 2001 .

[32]  J. Sheng,et al.  Interferometric/daylight seismic imaging , 2004 .

[33]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Latest views of the sparse Radon transform , 2003 .

[34]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach: Part 1 — Explanation of the theory , 2005 .