Enhancing creative knowledge-work: Challenges and points of leverage

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore critical success factors in knowledge‐intensive creative project work, using product development as an example field.Design/methodology/approach – Critical‐incident based in‐depth interviews of 11 product development experts (chosen based on their recommendations and length of experience) were carried out. The results were categorized into thematic classes of critical factors.Findings – Most challenges are embedded in the context of the product development projects. Collaboration and cognitive‐motivational factors such as trust, attitude, and intrinsic motivation‐related issues formed the most common classes of discovered critical factors behind product development project success, along with the mediating categories of goal and autonomy‐related factors. Furthermore, product development specific skills or knowledge accounted only for a small minority of the identified factors.Practical implications – The most pressing learning objective becomes not updatin...

[1]  K. Puumalainen,et al.  The role of trust in organisational innovativeness , 2008 .

[2]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[3]  Daniel Forgues,et al.  The influence of a collaborative procurement approach using integrated design in construction on project team performance , 2009 .

[4]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[5]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Factors affecting ICT diffusion: a case study of three large Australian construction contractors , 2005 .

[6]  Michael Frese,et al.  Helping to improve suggestion systems: predictors of making suggestions in companies , 1999 .

[7]  R. Hunt,et al.  New product development projects and project manager skill sets in the telecommunications industry , 2009 .

[8]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[9]  D. Simonton.  Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[10]  M. Frese,et al.  Making Things Happen : Reciprocal Relationships between Work Characteristics and Personal Initiative ( PI ) in a Four-Wave Longitudinal Structural Equation Model , 2008 .

[11]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[12]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust within organisations , 2003 .

[13]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) IMPLEMENTATION CONSTRAINTS: A CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE , 2006 .

[14]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[15]  Gaynelle R. Winograd,et al.  Organizational Trust: What It Means, Why It Matters , 2000 .

[16]  Erling S. Andersen.  Warning: activity planning is hazardous to your project's health! , 1996 .

[17]  Andrew Davies,et al.  The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems , 2005 .

[18]  Devon S. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships , 2005 .

[19]  J. Michael Crant,et al.  The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. , 1995 .

[20]  Nick Turner,et al.  Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  Critical incident technique. , 2003 .

[22]  A. L. Frohman,et al.  Igniting organizational change from below: The power of personal initiative , 1997 .

[23]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. , 2005 .

[24]  Dirk J. Pons,et al.  Project Management for New Product Development , 2008 .

[25]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[26]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[27]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[28]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[29]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[30]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[31]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Educating for innovation , 2006 .

[32]  Vachara Peansupap,et al.  Factors affecting ICT diffusion , 2005 .

[33]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[34]  Tayyab Maqsood,et al.  A knowledge management approach to innovation and learning in the construction industry , 2009 .

[35]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[36]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Christian Korunka,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Personality in the Context of Resources, Environment, and the Startup Process—A Configurational Approach , 2003 .

[38]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[39]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  WHAT DO PROACTIVE PEOPLE DO? A LONGITUDINAL MODEL LINKING PROACTIVE PERSONALITY AND CAREER SUCCESS , 2001 .

[40]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  Proactive personality and career success. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Erling S. Andersen.  Rethinking Project Management: An Organisational Perspective , 2008 .

[42]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[43]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[44]  P. Ahmed.  Culture and climate for innovation , 1998 .

[45]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? , 2007 .