Elucidating mechanical transition effects of invading cancer cells with a subnucleus-scaled microfluidic serial dimensional modulation device.

Mechanical boundaries that define and regulate biological processes, such as cell-cell junctions and dense extracellular matrix networks, exist throughout the physiological landscape. During metastasis, cancer cells are able to invade across these barriers and spread to distant tissues. While transgressing boundaries is a necessary step for distal colonies to form, little is known about interface effects on cell behavior during invasion. Here we introduce a device and metric to assess cell transition effects across mechanical barriers. Using MDA-MB-231 cells, a highly metastatic breast adenocarcinoma cell line, our results demonstrate that dimensional modulation in confined spaces with mechanical barriers smaller than the cell nucleus can induce distinct invasion phases and elongated morphological states. Further investigations on the impact of microtubule stabilization and drug resistance reveal that taxol-treated cells have reduced ability in invading across tight spaces and lose their super-diffusive migratory state and taxol-resistant cells exhibit asymmetric cell division at barrier interfaces. These results illustrate that subnucleus-scaled confinement modulation can play a distinctive role in inducing behavioral responses in invading cells and can help reveal the mechanical elements of non-proteolytic invasion.

[1]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[2]  Yukinori Endo,et al.  A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  M. Jordan,et al.  Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  J. Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear Shape, Mechanics, and Mechanotransduction , 2008, Circulation research.

[5]  Melody A Swartz,et al.  Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[6]  C. Heeschen,et al.  Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. , 2007, Cell stem cell.

[7]  P. Schiff,et al.  Taxol stabilizes microtubules in mouse fibroblast cells. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[9]  Jochen Herms,et al.  Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation , 2010, Nature Medicine.

[10]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[11]  C. Lengauer,et al.  Aneuploidy and cancer , 2004, Nature.

[12]  R. Preuss,et al.  Anomalous dynamics of cell migration , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  E. Holzbaur,et al.  Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  Casey M. Kraning-Rush,et al.  Cellular Traction Stresses Increase with Increasing Metastatic Potential , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  David Erickson,et al.  Microfabricated Physical Spatial Gradients for Investigating Cell Migration and Invasion Dynamics , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  F. Lanni,et al.  Cell traction forces on soft biomaterials. I. Microrheology of type I collagen gels. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells , 2007 .

[20]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Spontaneous migration of cancer cells under conditions of mechanical confinement. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[21]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[22]  John S. Condeelis,et al.  Chemotaxis in cancer , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Cell Nuclei Spin in the Absence of Lamin B1* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[26]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Xingyu Jiang,et al.  Directing cell migration with asymmetric micropatterns. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation , 2007, Nature.

[29]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Illuminating the metastatic process , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[31]  Robert H. Austin,et al.  Probing the invasiveness of prostate cancer cells in a 3D microfabricated landscape , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Rakesh K Jain,et al.  Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[36]  Bartosz A. Grzybowski,et al.  Directing cell motions on micropatterned ratchets , 2009 .

[37]  S. Morrison,et al.  Efficient tumor formation by single human melanoma cells , 2008, Nature.

[38]  Stephen J. Weiss,et al.  Protease-dependent versus -independent cancer cell invasion programs: three-dimensional amoeboid movement revisited , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[39]  Kathleen E. Rankin,et al.  Long astral microtubules uncouple mitotic spindles from the cytokinetic furrow , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Susan Band Horwitz,et al.  Mechanisms of Taxol resistance related to microtubules , 2003, Oncogene.

[42]  A. Ridley,et al.  Microtubules Regulate Migratory Polarity through Rho/ROCK Signaling in T Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[43]  Juergen A. Knoblich,et al.  Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[45]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[46]  D. Panda,et al.  Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamics by indanocine perturbs EB1 localization, induces defects in cell polarity and inhibits migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. , 2012, Biochemical pharmacology.

[47]  P. A. Dimilla,et al.  Vascular smooth muscle cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[48]  I. Macdonald,et al.  Metastasis: Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[49]  M. Stearns,et al.  Taxol blocks processes essential for prostate tumor cell (PC-3 ML) invasion and metastases. , 1992, Cancer research.

[50]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[51]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments , 2011, Physical biology.

[52]  D. Pellman,et al.  From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[53]  Michel Bornens,et al.  External forces control mitotic spindle positioning , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[54]  S. Horwitz,et al.  Wild-type class I β-tubulin sensitizes Taxol-resistant breast adenocarcinoma cells harboring a β-tubulin mutation , 2007 .