The effectiveness of the meaningful learning-based evaluation for different achieving students in a ubiquitous learning context

In recent years, fueled by the rise of mobile technology, ubiquitous learning has shown great potential in various disciplines, especially in context-aware environments. However, improper applications of this learning approach may also lead to inefficient learning and even reduced learning effectiveness. It is thus necessary to assess whether a ubiquitous learning project is able to achieve the aim of meaningful learning, so as to empower learners in scaffolding their knowledge students with different levels of achievement, especially low-achieving ones. This study aims to investigate the impact of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method on ubiquitous learning, in order to enhance the target system. A quasi-experiment is designed for this purpose, in which the post-evaluation and refined ubiquitous learning activities are adopted for the experimental group, in contrast to the control group, which works without the proposed evaluation method. The findings show that the evaluating ubiquitous learning using the meaningful learning paradigm can significantly enhance learning effectiveness, especially for low-achieving students, although the gains were not so significant for the high-achieving students, as seen in the posttest. Moreover, no significant differences in learning effectiveness were found between the experimental and control groups. The results of the posttest showed that the low-achieving students in the experimental group significantly outperformed those in the control group. This study suggests that the functions of a learning system may be need to be further enhanced to better suit the needs of low-achieving students, and that the use of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method is an effective way to find out what needs to be improved. We aim to investigate the impact of a meaningful learning evaluation method.The evaluation method can reveal the advantages and disadvantages of u-learning.Meaningful learning benefits learning effectiveness of low-achieving students.

[1]  Hsin Ning Jessie Ho,et al.  Scientific epistemic beliefs, conceptions of learning science and self-efficacy of learning science among high school students , 2011 .

[2]  Symeon Retalis,et al.  Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  The design and implementation of a holistic training model for language teacher education in a cyber face-to-face learning environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Meaningful Learning and Transfer of Learning in Games Played Repeatedly Without Feedback , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  Context Aware Ubiquitous Learning Environments for Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Learning , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Mark Grabe,et al.  Integrating the Internet for Meaningful Learning , 1999 .

[7]  David Kember,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of educational innovations: Using the study process questionnaire to show that meaningful learning occurs , 1997 .

[8]  Sten Henrysson,et al.  Correction of item-total correlations in item analysis , 1963 .

[9]  Mark Grabe,et al.  Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning , 1995 .

[10]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Applying web-enabled self-regulated learning and problem-based learning with initiation to involve low-achieving students in learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  To foster meaningful learning: Is science still relevant? , 1999 .

[14]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[15]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[16]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park , 2012 .

[17]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children's learning in museums , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  College students' conceptions of context-aware ubiquitous learning: A phenomenographic analysis , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  D. Ausubel.  The psychology of meaningful verbal learning : an introduction to school learning / David P. Ausubel , 1963 .

[21]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Design, development, and assessment of mobile applications: the case for problem-based learning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[22]  Tzung-Shi Chen,et al.  Context-Aware Writing in Ubiquitous Learning Environments , 2008, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (wmute 2008).

[23]  Timothy K. Shih,et al.  Ubiquitous e-Learning With Multimodal Multimedia Devices , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[24]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Päivi Karppinen,et al.  Meaningful Learning with Digital and Online Videos: Theoretical Perspectives , 2005 .

[26]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Applying social tagging to manage cognitive load in a Web 2.0 self-learning environment , 2013, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  C. Akinsanya,et al.  Concept mapping for meaningful learning. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[28]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Supporting Communities of Learners with Technology: A Vision for Integrating Technology with Learning in Schools. , 1995 .

[29]  Claudia Smarkola,et al.  Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  PERKAM: Personalized Knowledge Awareness Map for Computer Supported Ubiquitous Learning , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A knowledge acquisition approach to developing Mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Yen-Ting Lin,et al.  Development of a diagnostic system using a testing-based approach for strengthening student prior knowledge , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Hsinyi Peng,et al.  From Virtual Environments to Physical Environments: Exploring Interactivity in Ubiquitous-learning Systems , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[35]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  The application of Simulation-Assisted Learning Statistics (SALS) for correcting misconceptions and improving understanding of correlation , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  A WordNet-Based Near-Synonyms and Similar-Looking Word Learning System , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[37]  Ling-Hsiu Chen,et al.  Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Enhance low-achieving students' learning involvement in Taiwan's higher education: an approach via e-learning with problem-based learning and self-regulated learning , 2010 .