Effect of cascade use on the carbon balance of the German and European wood sectors

Abstract Wood product models have often been used to estimate the carbon dynamics of wood products and evaluate their effects on the mitigation of climate change. Their increasing complexity allows for advanced analysis of industrial product conversion efficiency, product lifespan and recycling rate, although data availability for such analyses is very often problematic. In spite of the widely recognised importance of cascade chains from one wood product to another, some wood product models represent them with recycling parameters that allocate part of the recycled wood to the same product category. Consequently, the infinite repetition of these loops overestimates carbon stock. This study analyses and benchmarks the effect on carbon stock in wood products for the German wood sector, when infinite recycling loops in wood product models are replaced by cascade chains. Different scenarios were simulated to analyse the effect of enhanced cascade chains. We estimated the carbon stock in the German wood product sector at 22.17 ± 3.82 t C per hectare of forest in the most realistic current scenario, an amount that is overestimated by 15.8% if infinite recycling loops were used instead. The deviation on the estimated carbon stock was derived from the uncertainty of allocation parameters. Then we estimated the carbon stock in the European wood product sector (EU-28) at 1231.76 t C, representing 9.16 t C per hectare of forest. The carbon stock in German wood product sector estimated for the high quality wood benchmark scenario (103.17 t C per hectare of forest) indicated that strategies to promote the development of new product designs and material technologies to enhance cascading may have the highest impact on carbon stock in the wood product sector. Studies aiming at reducing uncertainty on results are urgent, because the use of wood products is becoming an important strategy of the international community to mitigate climate change. At the same time, a correct representation of cascade use in wood product models is important because cascade practices are being promoted by governments and will probably become more common in the near future.

[1]  Hubert Jochheim,et al.  The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector , 2016, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[2]  Eric Marland,et al.  Archived Version from Ncdocks Institutional Repository a Distributed Approach to Accounting for Carbon in Wood Products , 2022 .

[3]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol , 2004 .

[4]  A. Grigoriou,et al.  Hydrothermal recycling of waste and performance of the recycled wooden particleboards. , 2008, Waste management.

[5]  Daniel B. Müller,et al.  Long‐term Coordination of Timber Production and Consumption Using a Dynamic Material and Energy Flow Analysis , 2004 .

[6]  Lars Wilhelmsson,et al.  Models for Predicting Wood Properties in Stems of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden , 2002 .

[7]  Roberto Pilli,et al.  EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products , 2015, Carbon Balance and Management.

[8]  Thomas A. Groen,et al.  CO2FIX V 3.1 - A modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems , 2004 .

[9]  Martin Junginger,et al.  The GHG contribution of the cascaded use of harvested wood products in comparison with the use of wood for energy-A case study on available forest resources in Canada , 2013 .

[10]  P. Dietz,et al.  Dichte und Rindengehalt von Industrieholz , 1975, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[11]  Mark E. Harmon,et al.  Carbon balance on federal forest lands of Western Oregon and Washington: The impact of the Northwest Forest Plan , 2012 .

[12]  Jari Liski,et al.  Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget , 2003 .

[13]  P. Muukkonen,et al.  Generalized allometric volume and biomass equations for some tree species in Europe , 2007, European Journal of Forest Research.

[14]  Sebastian Rüter Projection of net-emissions from harvested wood products in European countries : for the period 2013 - 2020 , 2011 .

[15]  Franz Kroiher,et al.  National forest inventories : Chapter 13, Germany , 2010 .

[16]  Sebastian Rüter,et al.  Ökobilanz-Basisdaten für Bauprodukte aus Holz , 2012 .

[17]  Laura Sokka,et al.  Cascading use of wood in Finland: with comparison to selected EU countries , 2015 .

[18]  Caren C. Dymond,et al.  Carbon sequestration in managed temperate coniferous forests under climate change , 2015 .

[19]  R. Madlener,et al.  The Role of Wood Material for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation , 2006 .

[20]  G. Kohlmaier,et al.  Application of the stock change and the production approach to Harvested Wood Products in the EU-15 countries: a comparative analysis , 2007, European Journal of Forest Research.

[21]  Holger Weimar,et al.  Physical input-output accounting of the wood and paper flow in Germany , 2015 .

[22]  Fabian Wagner,et al.  Methane Emissions from Landfills and Carbon Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products: The First-Order Decay Revisited , 2006 .

[23]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  A roadmap for rapid decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[24]  Frédéric Mothe,et al.  Quantifying the impact of forest management on the carbon balance of the forest-wood product chain: A case study applied to even-aged oak stands in France , 2012 .

[25]  P. Leitão,et al.  Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe , 2014 .

[26]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe , 2011 .

[27]  D. Klein,et al.  The Contribution of Managed and Unmanaged Forests to Climate Change Mitigation—A Model Approach at Stand Level for the Main Tree Species in Bavaria , 2013 .

[28]  Frank Werner,et al.  National and global greenhouse gas dynamics of different forest management and wood use scenarios: a model-based assessment , 2010 .

[29]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[30]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Carbon, Fossil Fuel, and Biodiversity Mitigation With Wood and Forests , 2014 .

[31]  Ernst-Detlef Schulze,et al.  Forest management and carbon sequestration in wood products , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[32]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Cascade utilization of biomass: strategies for a more efficient use of a scarce resource , 2000 .

[33]  Markus Erhard,et al.  An approach towards an estimate of the impact of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget: Germany as a case study , 2002 .

[34]  Michael Köhl,et al.  Harvested wood products and REDD+: looking beyond the forest border , 2016, Carbon Balance and Management.

[35]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Climate change effects of forestry and substitution of carbon-intensive materials and fossil fuels , 2017 .

[36]  Claude Vidal,et al.  National Forest Inventories Assessment of Wood Availability and Use , 2016 .

[37]  Hubert Jochheim,et al.  Modelling carbon stocks and fluxes in the wood product sector: a comparative review , 2016, Global change biology.