Structural effects of glue application in spiders-what can we learn from silk anchors?

Silk is a key innovation in spiders that equally fascinates biologists and material scientists. The anchoring of silken threads is a critical, yet poorly understood aspect of web-building—one that could lead to the development of advanced adhesives. To anchor silk, most spiders produce a structurally unique and rather unexplored bio-adhesive: the two-compound piriform gland secretion. The secretion is spun into elaborate patterns, so called attachment discs that anchor silken threads to substrates. The piriform gland secretion is a glue-coated fibre that combines the high toughness of silk with strong adhesion, even to highly repellent surfaces like Teflon. The glue is used highly economically, dries within less than a second after extrusion and can remain stable for years. Its hierarchical organization, discontinuous contact area and the embedding of compliant fibres may explain the high adhesive performance and flaw tolerance of such a composite product coming from a single, rather simple, type of silk glands. These principles contradict, in many regards, the paradigms of adhesives design and application, like aimed homogeneity of the bonding. Understanding the function of silk anchors may therefore trigger the development of novel industrial adhesives with embedded fibres, and methods of gaining higher bonding strength with less material consumption by smart glue application.

[1]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  L. Zylberberg,et al.  Fine structural aspects of silk secretion in a spider (Araneus diadematus). I. Elaboration in the pyriform glands. , 1980, Tissue & cell.

[3]  V. Li On Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) , 2003 .

[4]  B. Watermann,et al.  Peculiarities of barnacle adhesive cured on non-stick surfaces , 2003 .

[5]  F. Vollrath,et al.  The Role of Behavior in the Evolution of Spiders, Silks, and Webs , 2007 .

[6]  Sarah Rauscher,et al.  Proline and glycine control protein self-organization into elastomeric or amyloid fibrils. , 2006, Structure.

[7]  Z. Shao,et al.  Elasticity of spider silks. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Composition and substrate-dependent strength of the silken attachment discs in spiders , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  Three-dimensional printing spiders: back-and-forth glue application yields silk anchorages with high pull-off resistance under varying loading situations , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  W. Eberhard Possible functional significance of spigot placement on the spinnerets of spiders , 2010 .

[11]  L W Jelinski,et al.  Molecular Orientation and Two-Component Nature of the Crystalline Fraction of Spider Dragline Silk , 1996, Science.

[12]  T. Lefèvre,et al.  Diversity of molecular transformations involved in the formation of spider silks. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. W. Work Web Components Associated with the Major Ampullate Silk Fibers of Orb-Web-Building Spiders , 1981 .

[14]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Spider silk as rubber , 1984, Nature.

[15]  A Tamarin,et al.  The structure and formation of the byssus attachment plaque in Mytilus , 1976, Journal of morphology.

[16]  F Vollrath,et al.  Predicting the mechanical properties of spider silk as a model nanostructured polymer , 2005, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[17]  Jianguo Huang,et al.  Tensile behavior and morphology of differently degummed silkworm (Bombyx mori) cocoon silk fibres , 2006 .

[18]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nanostructure and molecular mechanics of spider dragline silk protein assemblies , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[19]  B. Swanson,et al.  The evolution of complex biomaterial performance: The case of spider silk. , 2009, Integrative and comparative biology.

[20]  A. Dhinojwala,et al.  Synthetic adhesive attachment discs inspired by spider's pyriform silk architecture , 2014 .

[21]  Y. Hsia,et al.  Synthetic spider silk fibers spun from Pyriform Spidroin 2, a glue silk protein discovered in orb-weaving spider attachment discs. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[22]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  Bioprospecting Finds the Toughest Biological Material: Extraordinary Silk from a Giant Riverine Orb Spider , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  K. Kendall Thin-film peeling-the elastic term , 1975 .

[24]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  F. Harrison,et al.  Structure and cytochemistry of the silk glands of the mygalomorph spider Antrodiaetus unicolor (araneae, antrodiaetidae) , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[26]  Todd A. Blackledge,et al.  Viscoelastic solids explain spider web stickiness. , 2010, Nature communications.

[27]  J. Coddington Spinneret Silk Spigot Morphology: Evidence for the Monophyly of Orbweaving Spiders, Cyrtophorinae (Araneidae), and the Group Theridiidae Plus Nesticidae , 1989 .

[28]  J. Coddington,et al.  Ontogenetic Changes in the Spinning Fields of Nuctenea Cornuta and Neoscona Theisi (Araneae, Araneidae) , 1990 .

[29]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Sequential origin in the high performance properties of orb spider dragline silk , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Costantino Creton,et al.  Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course , 2003 .

[31]  Manuel Elices,et al.  Mechanical properties of single‐brin silkworm silk , 2000 .

[32]  F. Roberto,et al.  Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion , 2007, Marine Biotechnology.

[33]  Kenneth W. Desmond,et al.  Dynamics of mussel plaque detachment. , 2015, Soft matter.

[34]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Mushroom-shaped geometry of contact elements in biological adhesive systems , 2007 .

[35]  R. Lewis,et al.  Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[36]  Federico Bosia,et al.  Numerical implementation of multiple peeling theory and its application to spider web anchorages , 2015, Interface Focus.

[37]  A. Moore,et al.  Resilient silk captures prey in black widow cobwebs , 2006 .

[38]  Y. Termonia Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity , 1994 .

[39]  A. Falick,et al.  Pyriform Spidroin 1, a Novel Member of the Silk Gene Family That Anchors Dragline Silk Fibers in Attachment Discs of the Black Widow Spider, Latrodectus hesperus* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Friedrich G. Barth,et al.  Dragline-associated behaviour of the orb web spider Nephila clavipes (Araneoidea, Tetragnathidae) , 1998 .

[41]  C. Hayashi,et al.  Complete gene sequence of spider attachment silk protein (PySp1) reveals novel linker regions and extreme repeat homogenization. , 2017, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[42]  M. Elices,et al.  Effect of degumming on the tensile properties of silkworm (Bombyx mori) silk fiber , 2002 .

[43]  Barbara Mazzolai,et al.  Hierarchical multiple peeling simulations , 2014 .

[44]  M. Sever,et al.  Metal-mediated cross-linking in the generation of a marine-mussel adhesive. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[45]  T. Nagashima,et al.  The Secretion Process of Liquid Silk with Nanopillar Structures from Stenopsyche marmorata (Trichoptera: Stenopsychidae) , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[46]  S. O. Andersen Amino acid composition of spider silks , 1970 .

[47]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[48]  Lars Heepe,et al.  Adhesion failure at 180,000 frames per second: direct observation of the detachment process of a mushroom-shaped adhesive. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[49]  Luciano Afferrante,et al.  Adhesion of Elastic Thin Films: Double Peeling of Tapes Versus Axisymmetric Peeling of Membranes , 2013, Tribology Letters.

[50]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  Hunting with sticky tape: functional shift in silk glands of araneophagous ground spiders (Gnaphosidae) , 2017, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  F. Grosse,et al.  Composition and Hierarchical Organisation of a Spider Silk , 2007, PloS one.

[52]  Ali Dhinojwala,et al.  Cobweb-weaving spiders produce different attachment discs for locomotion and prey capture , 2012, Nature Communications.

[53]  Steven W. Cranford,et al.  Synergetic material and structure optimization yields robust spider web anchorages. , 2013, Small.

[54]  W. Federle,et al.  Biomechanics of plant-insect interactions. , 2013, Current opinion in plant biology.

[55]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Impact tolerance in mussel thread networks by heterogeneous material distribution , 2013, Nature Communications.

[56]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  Spider's super-glue: thread anchors are composite adhesives with synergistic hierarchical organization. , 2015, Soft matter.

[57]  S. Licoccia,et al.  The critical role of water in spider silk and its consequence for protein mechanics. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[58]  P. Dolejš,et al.  Developmental changes in the spinning apparatus over the life cycle of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 2014 .

[59]  Nicola M. Pugno The theory of multiple peeling , 2009 .

[60]  M. Elices,et al.  Fractographic analysis of silkworm and spider silk , 2002 .

[61]  Kristin Sott,et al.  Adsorption behavior and enzymatically or chemically induced cross‐linking of a mussel adhesive protein , 2000 .

[62]  W. Eberhard Physical properties of sticky spirals and their connections: sliding connections in orb webs , 1976 .

[63]  Jessica Siltberg-Liberles,et al.  Piriform spider silk sequences reveal unique repetitive elements. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[64]  M. S. Engster,et al.  Studies on silk secretion in the trichoptera (F. Limnephilidae) , 1976, Cell and Tissue Research.