Competitiveness through technology management: an empirical study of the Indian software industry

Technology is one of the critical factors in deciding whether technology intensive firms are able to succeed in gaining sustainable economic growth in a highly competitive market. In order to realise sustainable development, it is very important to achieve technological competitiveness. This study is an attempt to examine the role of technology in an APP (Assets, Processes, Performance) framework with 100 firm-level data from the software industry. Using the results from the questionnaire survey, this study develops valid and reliable measures for finding out the role of technology and its significant contribution to the business outcome. Factor analysis results show that for the same level of business outcome, technological processes are a better predictor than technological assets. Further, the relationship among the technological variables (both processes and assets) and performance variables is found to be statistically significant and positive. The study concludes that the technological processes, which are very much internal to the firm, are also eternal to the firm and free from imitation by competitors. The process of economic liberalisation and increased entry of MNCs will lead to the consistent enhancement of the technological competitiveness of Indian software firms in global markets.

[1]  P. Coughlan,et al.  Development of a technical innovation audit , 1996 .

[2]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Measuring customer satisfaction , 1995 .

[3]  M. Bensaou,et al.  The right mind-set for managing information technology. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The new meaning of quality in the information age. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[5]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  Human Issues in Technology Implementation. , 1994 .

[6]  D. Samson,et al.  A strategic framework for technical function management in manufacturing , 1996 .

[7]  Rajeev K. Goel,et al.  On the adoption of new technologies , 1997 .

[8]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1984 .

[9]  Kuang S. Yeh,et al.  Technology Transfer in Taiwan's Information Industry: The Lessons , 1996 .

[10]  L. Kim.  The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors , 1997 .

[11]  Trilochan Sastry,et al.  Competitiveness of Indian Manufacturing , 1998 .

[12]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  Managing Green Technologies for Global Competitiveness , 1996 .

[13]  Kiran Momaya,et al.  International competitiveness of the Canadian construction industry: a comparison with Japan and the United States , 1998 .

[14]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Managing Global Innovation: Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness , 1999 .

[15]  Wil Lepkowski.  Latin America Lays New Groundwork For Science And Technology: Spurred by economic success of Pacific Rim countries, Latin America is embracing research as key to development , 1996 .

[16]  Dale H. Bent,et al.  Managing Information Strategically: Increase Your Company's Competitiveness and Efficiency by Using Information as a Strategic Tool: (The Ernst & Young Information Management Series) J. McGee and L. Prusak. John Wiley, New York (1993). xvii + 244 pp., $34.95, ISBN 0-471-57544-5 , 1995 .

[17]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  The Productivity Paradox , 1986, The Productivity-Inclusiveness Nexus.

[18]  Mee-Jean Kim.  A comparative analysis of the information sectors of South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan , 1996 .

[19]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[20]  K. Kraemer,et al.  : Evidence from , 2022 .

[21]  T. R. Madanmohan.  Failures and Coping Strategies in Indigenous Technology Capability Process , 2000 .

[22]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Technology development and transfer: experiences from Malaysia , 1997 .

[23]  Raymond Radosevich,et al.  Strategic Challenges and Proposed Responses to Competitiveness through Public-Sector Technology , 1993 .

[24]  G. Stalk.  Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .