Location- and object-based attention enhance number estimation

Humans and non-humans can extract an estimate of the number of items in a collection very rapidly, raising the question of whether attention is necessary for this process. Visual attention operates in various modes, showing selectivity both to spatial location and to objects. Here, we tested whether each form of attention can enhance number estimation, by measuring whether presenting a visual cue to increase attentional engagement will lead to a more accurate and precise representation of number, both when attention is directed to location and when it is directed to objects. Results revealed that enumeration of a collection of dots in the location previously cued led to faster, more precise, and more accurate judgments than enumeration in un-cued locations, and a similar benefit was seen when the cue and collection appeared on the same object. This work shows that like many other perceptual tasks, numerical estimation may be enhanced by the spread of active attention inside a pre-cued object.

[1]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A Labeled-Line Code for Small and Large Numerosities in the Monkey Prefrontal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[3]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  A. Henik,et al.  Conceptual Size in Developmental Dyscalculia and Dyslexia , 2018, Neuropsychology.

[5]  A. Henik,et al.  A disassociation between physical and mental number bisection in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  H. Hollingworth.  The Central Tendency of Judgment , 1910 .

[7]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[8]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[9]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[10]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Spontaneous representation of numerosity in typical and dyscalculic development , 2019, Cortex.

[12]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[13]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  R. Snowden,et al.  Attention to overlapping objects: detection and discrimination of luminance changes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[17]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[18]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Justin Halberda,et al.  PsiMLE: A maximum-likelihood estimation approach to estimating psychophysical scaling and variability more reliably, efficiently, and flexibly , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.

[21]  K Jährig,et al.  IN NEWBORN INFANTS , 1984 .

[22]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes along the right lines: differentiating between scale and bias. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures , 2008, Science.

[25]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling global scene factors in attention. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Higher attentional costs for numerosity estimation at high densities , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[28]  D. Burr,et al.  Compressive mapping of number to space reflects dynamic encoding mechanisms, not static logarithmic transform , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Yarden Gliksman,et al.  Alerting cues enhance the subitizing process , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[30]  David C. Burr,et al.  The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space , 2012, Vision Research.

[31]  A. Nieder.  Counting on neurons: the neurobiology of numerical competence , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  David C. Geary,et al.  Development of Number Line Representations in Children With Mathematical Learning Disability , 2008, Developmental neuropsychology.

[33]  David C. Burr,et al.  Linear mapping of numbers onto space requires attention , 2012, Cognition.

[34]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Links Between the Intuitive Sense of Number and Formal Mathematics Ability. , 2013, Child development perspectives.

[35]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[36]  Mary K. Hoard,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. , 2007, Child development.

[37]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[38]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[39]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Temporal context calibrates interval timing , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  David C Burr,et al.  Visual sustained attention and numerosity sensitivity correlate with math achievement in children. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[41]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  G. Alvarez.  Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.