Noninvasive validation of central and peripheral augmentation index estimated by a novel wrist-worn tonometer

Background: The validation of new blood pressure devices with easier use and more rapid data collection may facilitate the incorporation of these measures into clinical practice. We analyze the reliability and validity of Pulse Wave Analysis as reported by a novel wrist-worn device, easy and quick to use, comparing central and peripheral augmentation index (AIx) with the same measures from the SphygmoCor. Additionally, we analyzed clinical relevance through the association of the Pulse Wave Analysis, as reported by a novel wrist-worn device, with other cardiovascular parameters. Methods: Cross-sectional study including 254 participants. Mean age was 51.9 ± 13.4 years and 53% were women. Measurements: peripheral AIx (PAIx) and central AIx (CAIx) by the wrist-worn device and SphygmoCor (MM3); carotid−femoral (cf) pulse wave velocity (PWV) by SphygmoCor (MM3); cardioankle-vascular index (CAVI), ankle−brachial index (ABI) and brachial−ankle (ba) PWV by the Vasera device and carotid−intima media thickness (IMT) by ultrasonography. Results: Intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for PAIx was 0.886 (95% CI 0.803−0.934) and for CAIx 0.943 (95% CI 0.901−0.968) with Bland Altman limits of agreement −0.75 (−23.8 to 21.8) and 0.08 (−15.7 to 15.9), respectively. Inter-observer ICC for PAIx was 0.952 (95% CI 0.915−0.972) and CAIx 0.893 (95% CI 0.811−0.939) with limits of agreement −0.45 (−13.7 to 12.8) and 0.43 (−17.7 to 18.5), respectively. Comparing the wrist-worn device with SphygmoCor, the ICC was 0.849 (95% CI 0.798−0.887) for PAIx, and 0.783 (95% CI 0.711−0.838) for CAIx. In Bland−Altman, limits of agreement for PAIx 1.03 (−20.67 to 22.73), and for CAIx −2.14 (−24.79 to 20.50). PAIx and CAIx, from the wrist-worn device, correlated with age, CAVI, ABI, baPWV, cfPWV, IMT, glomerular filtration and cardiovascular risk. Conclusion: AIx measurements by wrist-worn device shows a good intra-observer and inter-observer reliability, inter-device noninvasive reliability and validity when compared with SphygmoCor, and clinical relevance by association with measures of vascular structure and function, end-organ damage and cardiovascular risk. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02623894; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02623894.

[1]  U. Cieślik-Guerra,et al.  Correlations of pulse wave velocity with augmentation index and ambulatory arterial stiffness index in the population of patients after acute coronary syndrome. Preliminary results of the FOREVER study. , 2013, Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej.

[2]  J. Izzo Brachial vs. central systolic pressure and pulse wave transmission indicators: a critical analysis. , 2014, American journal of hypertension.

[3]  Paolo Salvi,et al.  Validation of a new non-invasive portable tonometer for determining arterial pressure wave and pulse wave velocity: the PulsePen device , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  Siegfried Wassertheurer,et al.  Validation of a Brachial Cuff-Based Method for Estimating Central Systolic Blood Pressure , 2011, Hypertension.

[5]  J. Recio-Rodríguez,et al.  Association of television viewing time with central hemodynamic parameters and the radial augmentation index in adults. , 2013, American journal of hypertension.

[6]  A. Yamashina,et al.  Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. , 2002, Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension.

[7]  Stéphane Laurent,et al.  The Noninvasive Assessment of Vascular Aging. , 2016, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[8]  K. Kario,et al.  Why the radial augmentation index is low in patients with diabetes: The J-HOP study. , 2016, Atherosclerosis.

[9]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  In vivo evaluation of a novel, wrist-mounted arterial pressure sensing device versus the traditional hand-held tonometer. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  Carlos Correia,et al.  Novel Methods for Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement , 2015, Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering.

[11]  Yan Li,et al.  Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[12]  A. Sahebkar,et al.  Effects of statin therapy on augmentation index as a measure of arterial stiffness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  A. Hughes,et al.  Validation of non-invasive central blood pressure devices: ARTERY Society task force consensus statement on protocol standardization , 2017, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Giral,et al.  Radial augmentation index is a surrogate marker of atherosclerotic burden in a primary prevention cohort. , 2013, Atherosclerosis.

[15]  C. Vlachopoulos,et al.  Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality With Brachial-Ankle Elasticity Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, Hypertension.

[16]  J. Sharman,et al.  Evaluation of a brachial cuff and suprasystolic waveform algorithm method to noninvasively derive central blood pressure. , 2015, American journal of hypertension.

[17]  K. Kotani,et al.  Evaluation of the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index, a New Indicator of Arterial Stiffness Independent of Blood Pressure, in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome , 2008, Hypertension Research.

[18]  G. Frontera,et al.  The Association Between the Cardio-ankle Vascular Index and Other Parameters of Vascular Structure and Function in Caucasian Adults: MARK Study. , 2015, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[19]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  The task force for the management ofarterial hypertension of the european society ofhypertension (esh) and of the european society of cardiology (esc) , 2013 .

[20]  Yoshio Kobayashi,et al.  Invasive validation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) for measuring central blood pressure , 2017, Journal of hypertension.

[21]  M. Band,et al.  Peripheral blood pressure measurement is as good as applanation tonometry at predicting ascending aortic blood pressure , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[22]  E. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Relationship between objectively measured physical activity and cardiovascular aging in the general population--the EVIDENT trial. , 2014, Atherosclerosis.

[23]  Kuniaki Otsuka,et al.  A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). , 2006, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[24]  O. Polašek,et al.  Normative equations for central augmentation index: assessment of inter-population applicability and how it could be improved , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  P Kligfield,et al.  Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[27]  Luis García-Ortiz,et al.  Protocol for measuring carotid intima-media thickness that best correlates with cardiovascular risk and target organ damage. , 2012, American journal of hypertension.

[28]  S. Momomura,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure and the augmentation index in the seated position: a validation study of two commercially available methods , 2013, Journal of hypertension.

[29]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2007, Blood pressure.

[30]  C. Schmid,et al.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[31]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  R. Karas,et al.  Peripheral augmentation index as a biomarker of vascular aging: an invasive hemodynamics approach , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[33]  W. Abhayaratna,et al.  Randomized Trial of Guiding Hypertension Management Using Central Aortic Blood Pressure Compared With Best-Practice Care: Principal Findings of the BP GUIDE Study , 2013, Hypertension.

[34]  Telmo Pereira,et al.  Invasive validation of the Complior Analyse in the assessment of central artery pressure curves: a methodological study , 2014, Blood pressure monitoring.

[35]  L. Stoner,et al.  Assessments of Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Using Pulse Wave Analysis , 2012, International journal of vascular medicine.

[36]  Hao-Min Cheng,et al.  Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[37]  T. Tamaki,et al.  Augmentation index does not reflect risk of coronary artery disease in elderly patients. , 2014, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[38]  D. Webb,et al.  Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. , 2002, American journal of hypertension.

[39]  C. Vlachopoulos,et al.  Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality With Arterial Stiffness , 2011 .

[40]  Augmentation index (AI) in a dose–response relationship with smoking habits in males , 2016, Medicine.

[41]  S. Millasseau,et al.  Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment , 2014, Journal of hypertension.

[42]  J. Filipovský,et al.  Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. , 2012, Journal of hypertension.

[43]  Yutaka Imai,et al.  Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. , 2005, Journal of hypertension.

[44]  W. Nichols,et al.  Validity of a novel wristband tonometer for measuring central hemodynamics and augmentation index. , 2014, American journal of hypertension.

[45]  Takanobu Tomaru,et al.  Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. , 2011, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[46]  A. Rogoza,et al.  Central aortic blood pressure and augmentation index: comparison between Vasotens ® and SphygmoCor ® technology , 2012 .

[47]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Radial augmentation index unmasks premature coronary artery disease in younger males , 2009, Blood pressure monitoring.

[48]  Siegfried Wassertheurer,et al.  Accuracy of commercial devices and methods for noninvasive estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure a systematic review and meta-analysis of invasive validation studies , 2016, Journal of hypertension.

[49]  R. González-Sarmiento,et al.  Association between different risk factors and vascular accelerated ageing (EVA study): study protocol for a cross-sectional, descriptive observational study , 2016, BMJ Open.

[50]  S. Shah,et al.  Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis. , 2016, American journal of hypertension.

[51]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Comparison of estimates of central systolic blood pressure and peripheral augmentation index obtained from the Omron HEM-9000AI and SphygmoCor systems , 2009 .

[52]  Jaspal S. Kooner,et al.  Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures. , 2003 .

[53]  S. Cho,et al.  Non-invasively measured aortic wave reflection and pulse pressure amplification are related to the severity of coronary artery disease. , 2013, Journal of cardiology.

[54]  J. Recio-Rodríguez,et al.  Comparison of two measuring instruments, B-pro and SphygmoCor system as reference, to evaluate central systolic blood pressure and radial augmentation index , 2012, Hypertension Research.

[55]  W. Nichols,et al.  Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel , 2014, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[56]  A. de la Sierra,et al.  Effects of metabolic syndrome on arterial function in different age groups: the Advanced Approach to Arterial Stiffness study , 2018, Journal of hypertension.

[57]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values. , 2014, American journal of hypertension.

[58]  B. Gaszner,et al.  Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity , 2010, Journal of hypertension.

[59]  Christodoulos Stefanadis,et al.  Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, European heart journal.

[60]  Philip Chowienczyk,et al.  Peripheral Augmentation Index Defines the Relationship Between Central and Peripheral Pulse Pressure , 2008, Hypertension.

[61]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. , 1997, Circulation.