Promoting the coordination of computer-mediated interdisciplinary collaboration

The goal of this research is to promote the coordination of computer-mediated interdisciplinary collaboration of partners with complementary expertise. Efficient collaboration is shown to depend strongly on the quality of the coordination activities. A first experiment investigated the effects of different technical realizations of computer-mediated collaboration on the coordination of activities. It revealed that especially a well-balanced sequence of phases of joint work and individual working phases was central for the quality of the problem-solving process. The goal of a second experiment was to test the effectiveness of promoting this coordination by vicarious learning from an exemplary computer-mediated collaboration. By combining two strands of research -- studies on worked-out examples and work on vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse -- we show a new and theoretically well-founded way to strengthen collaborative competence.

[1]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.

[2]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  Solving the Case Together : The Challenge of Net-based Interdisciplinary Collaboration , 2001 .

[3]  Constantino-Gonzales,et al.  Coaching Collaboration by Comparing Solutions and Tracking Participation. , 2001 .

[4]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[5]  K. VanLehn,et al.  Cognitive skill acquisition. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  K. Sycara,et al.  Reaching informed agreement in multispecialist cooperation , 1993 .

[7]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[8]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Learning from Worked-Out-Examples: A Study on Individual Differences , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[10]  Andrea K. Knapp,et al.  Learning together. , 1955, Nursing outlook.

[11]  Hans Spada,et al.  Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science , 1995 .

[12]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[13]  Frederick A. Rossini,et al.  International research management : studies in interdisciplinary methods from business, government, and academia , 1990 .

[14]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[15]  H. Mandl,et al.  Conditions and effects of example elaboration , 2002 .

[16]  H. Mandl,et al.  Learning from Worked-Out Examples: The Effects of Example Variability and Elicited Self-Explanations , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[17]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[18]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  COOPERATIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES , 1988 .

[19]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[20]  R. Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse , 1999 .

[21]  A. Renkl.  Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self- explanations , 2002 .

[22]  Richard Cox,et al.  Vicarious learning from educational dialogue , 1999, CSCL.

[23]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .