Cultivate, assess, advocate, implement, and sustain: A five-point plan for successful digital preservation collaborations

Purpose For libraries with limited resources, digital preservation can seem like a daunting responsibility. Forming partnerships can help build collective knowledge and maximize combined resources to achieve digital preservation goals. This paper aims to provide guidance to help libraries with limited resources achieve digital preservation goals by forming partnerships to build collective knowledge and maximize combined resources. Design/methodology/approach In 2015, librarians from four Montana institutions formed the Digital Preservation Working Group (DPWG), a collaboration to increase digital preservation efforts statewide. The group’s immediate goals were to promote digital preservation best-practices at each individual institution, and to learn about and support each other’s work. The group’s long-term goal was to implement a shared digital preservation service that would fill gaps in existing digital preservation efforts. Findings Beyond the cost savings gained by sharing a digital preservation service, the members of DPWG benefitted from shared knowledge and expertise gained during the partnership. The group also functioned as a sounding board as each institution built its digital preservation program, and it became a system of support when challenges arose. Practical/implications This paper proposes a five-point plan for creating digital preservation partnerships: cultivate a foundation of knowledge and identify a shared vision; assess the current digital preservation landscape at each institution; advocate for the value of digital preservation activities; implement shared digital preservation services; and sustain group activities and establish structures for ongoing support. Originality/value The activities of DPWG provide a model for institutions seeking to collaborate to meet digital preservation challenges. This paper shows that by implementing a structured plan, institutions can build and sustain digital preservation partnerships, thus positioning themselves to achieve digital preservation success.

[1]  Liz Bishoff,et al.  Managing Digital Collections Survey Results , 2015, D Lib Mag..

[2]  Megan Sniffin-Marinoff.  Taking a byte out of history: The archival preservation of federal computer records: House report 101-978, 101st Congress, 2d Session. U.S. Congress. House. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1990, 30 pages (SuDocs: Y1.1/8:101-978) , 1991 .

[3]  Yan Han.  Cloud storage for digital preservation: optimal uses of Amazon S3 and Glacier , 2015, Libr. Hi Tech.

[4]  Amanda Kay Rinehart,et al.  Overwhelmed to action: digital preservation challenges at the under-resourced institution , 2014, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[5]  Shu Liu,et al.  Digital preservation strategies at Colorado State University Libraries , 2013 .

[6]  Margaret O'Neill Adams,et al.  Digital Preservation through Archival Collaboration: The Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[7]  P. Conway,et al.  Archival Preservation Practice in a Nationwide Context. , 1990 .

[8]  Gry Elstrøm,et al.  Self-assessment of the Digital Repository at the State and University Library, Denmark - a Case Study , 2014, iPRES.

[9]  Magenta Book,et al.  AUDIT AND CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTWORTHY DIGITAL REPOSITORIES , 2011 .

[10]  Marc Blanchet,et al.  A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) , 2016, RFC.

[11]  Liz Bishoff.  Digital Preservation Plan: Ensuring Long Term Access and Authenticity of Digital Collections , 2010 .

[12]  Thomas H. Teper.  THE FUTURE OF PRESERVATION IN ARL LIBRARIES. , 2007 .

[13]  Brian Lavoie.  Meeting the challenges of digital preservation: the OAIS reference model , 2000 .

[14]  John Garrett,et al.  Preserving Digital Information. Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. , 1996 .

[15]  Tom Cramer,et al.  Designing and Implementing Second Generation Digital Preservation Services: A Scalable Model for the Stanford Digital Repository , 2010, D Lib Mag..

[16]  Jeff Rothenberg,et al.  Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Documents , 1995 .

[17]  Joyce M. Ray.  Search for tomorrow: The electronic records research program of the u.s. national historical publications and records commission , 1998 .

[18]  Kevin C. Miller.  Cloud-based Digital Preservation Services for Small or Midsized Institutions: Results of a pilot study of Archivematica + DuraCloud , 2015 .

[19]  Michael J. Day,et al.  Identifying Digital Preservation Requirements: Digital Preservation Strategy and Collection Profiling at the British Library , 2014, iPRES.

[20]  David S. H. Rosenthal,et al.  Bit Preservation: A Solved Problem? , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[21]  Rlg Oclc,et al.  Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities , 2002 .

[22]  Jane Greenberg,et al.  A balancing act: The ideal and the realistic in developing Dryad's preservation policy , 2014, First Monday.

[23]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Constructing Data Curation Profiles , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[24]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  How to choose a digital preservation strategy: evaluating a preservation planning procedure , 2007, JCDL '07.

[25]  Mary Baker,et al.  A fresh look at the reliability of long-term digital storage , 2005, EuroSys.

[26]  Ccsds Secretariat,et al.  Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) , 1999 .

[27]  Sarantos Kapidakis,et al.  Preservation Metadata , 2008 .