In vitro and in vivo assessments of the genotoxic potential of 3‐chloroallyl alcohol

3‐Chloroallyl alcohol (3‐CAA) can be found in the environment following the application of plant protection products. 3‐CAA is formed in groundwater following the injection of 1,3‐dichloropropene, a fumigant used to control nematodes. 3‐CAA is also formed, in leafy crops, as a glycoside conjugate following application of the herbicide, clethodim. Human exposure may occur from groundwater used as drinking water or through dietary consumption. To characterize 3‐CAA's potential to cause genotoxicity in mammals, in vitro and in vivo studies were conducted. 3‐CAA was negative in an Ames test and positive in a mouse lymphoma forward mutation assay. 3‐CAA was negative in an acute in vivo CD‐1 mouse bone marrow micronucleus assay when administered up to a dose level of 125 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days. In a combined gene mutation assay and erythrocyte micronucleus assay, using transgenic Big Blue® Fischer 344 rats, 3‐CAA was administered via drinking water at targeted dose levels of 0, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg/day for 29 days. Peripheral blood samples, collected at the end of treatment, were analyzed for micronucleus induction in reticulocytes using flow cytometry. Liver and bone marrow samples, collected 2 days after the termination of the treatment, were analyzed for the induction of mutations at the cII locus. 3‐CAA did not induce an increase in mutant frequency or micronuclei under the experimental conditions. In conclusion, the mutagenic response observed in the in vitro mouse lymphoma assay is not confirmed in the whole animal. 3‐CAA is not considered to pose a mutagenic risk.

[1]  C. Kala,et al.  DPP-4 inhibition mediated antidiabetic potential of phytoconstituents of an aqueous fruit extract of Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal: in-silico, in-vitro and in-vivo assessments , 2022, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  S. Gehen,et al.  In vivo mutagenicity evaluation of the soil fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene. , 2020, Mutagenesis.

[3]  S. Gehen,et al.  Weight of evidence analysis of the tumorigenic potential of 1,3-dichloropropene supports a threshold-based risk assessment , 2020, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[4]  I. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  Groundwater monitoring for 1,3‐dichloropropene in high fumigant use areas of North America and Europe , 2019, Pest management science.

[5]  A. Pulido-Bosch,et al.  A monitoring programme for 1,3-dichloropropene and metabolites in groundwater in five EU countries. , 2008, Pest management science.

[6]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[7]  Statistical evaluation of mutagenicity test data UKEMS Sub-Committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Report—Part III. Edited by D. J. Kirkland. Published 1989 by the University Press, Cambridge. No. of pages: 320. ISBN: 0-521-36605-4 , 1991, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[8]  J. O’Neill,et al.  Mutagenicity of alkaline constituents of a coal-liquified crude oil in mammalian cells. , 1980, Mutation research.

[9]  B. Ames,et al.  Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. , 1975, Mutation research.

[10]  CHEMICAL MUTAGENS: PRINCIPLES AND METHODS FOR THEIR DETECTION , 1972 .

[11]  M. Moore,et al.  In Vitro Mouse Lymphoma Cell (L5178Y Tk+/- -3.7.2.C) Forward Mutation Assay. , 2019, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  K. S. Rao,et al.  Mammalian toxicity of 1,3-dichloropropene. , 2001, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[13]  E. Carney,et al.  Dominant lethal test with rats exposed to 1,3‐dichloropropene by inhalation , 1998, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  P. McCall Hydrolysis of 1, 3‐dichloropropene in dilute aqueous solution , 1987 .

[15]  W. Schmid The Micronucleus Test for Cytogenetic Analysis , 1976 .

[16]  Robert L. Elston,et al.  Chemical mutagens. Principles and methods for their detection. Volume 2 , 1971 .