Finding flows of a Navier–Stokes fluid through quantum computing

There is great interest in using quantum computers to efficiently simulate a quantum system’s dynamics as existing classical computers cannot do this. Little attention, however, has been given to quantum simulation of a classical nonlinear continuum system such as a viscous fluid even though this too is hard for classical computers. Such fluids obey the Navier–Stokes nonlinear partial differential equations, whose solution is essential to the aerospace industry, weather forecasting, plasma magneto-hydrodynamics, and astrophysics. Here we present a quantum algorithm for solving the Navier–Stokes equations. We test the algorithm by using it to find the steady-state inviscid, compressible flow through a convergent-divergent nozzle when a shockwave is (is not) present. We find excellent agreement between numerical simulation results and the exact solution, including shockwave capture when present. Finally, we compare the algorithm’s computational cost to deterministic and random classical algorithms and show that a significant speed-up is possible. Our work points to a large new application area for quantum computing with substantial economic impact, including the trillion-dollar aerospace industry, weather-forecasting, and engineered-plasma technologies.

[1]  Stefan Heinrich The quantum query complexity of elliptic PDE , 2006 .

[2]  B. Kacewicz Almost optimal solution of initial-value problems by randomized and quantum algorithms , 2006 .

[3]  George N. Barakos,et al.  Parallel evaluation of quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics , 2018, Computers & Fluids.

[4]  R. Feynman Simulating physics with computers , 1999 .

[5]  Rene Steijl,et al.  Quantum Algorithms for Fluid Simulations , 2019, Advances in Quantum Communication and Information.

[6]  G. Brassard,et al.  Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , 2000, quant-ph/0005055.

[7]  Satish Karra,et al.  Towards Solving the Navier-Stokes Equation on Quantum Computers , 2019, ArXiv.

[8]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .

[9]  A. Shevchenko,et al.  Interference and polarization beating of independent arbitrarily polarized polychromatic optical waves , 2019, Physical Review A.

[10]  J. Yepez,et al.  Quantum lattice-gas model for computational fluid dynamics. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  J. Boon The Lattice Boltzmann Equation for Fluid Dynamics and Beyond , 2003 .

[12]  Jeffrey Yepez,et al.  Quantum Computation of Fluid Dynamics , 1998, QCQC.

[13]  Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz Randomized and quantum algorithms yield a speed-up for initial-value problems , 2004, J. Complex..

[14]  Stefano Longhi Spiral waves in optical parametric oscillators , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey Yepez,et al.  Lattice-Gas Quantum Computation , 1998 .

[16]  E. Solano,et al.  Quantum Simulator for Transport Phenomena in Fluid Flows , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  D. Gilbarg,et al.  Elliptic Partial Differential Equa-tions of Second Order , 1977 .

[18]  Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz Improved bounds on the randomized and quantum complexity of initial-value problems , 2005, J. Complex..

[19]  Boleslaw Z. Kacewicz,et al.  Optimal solution of ordinary differential equations , 1987, J. Complex..

[20]  Ronald E. Meyers,et al.  Simulation of applications in quantum computing , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[21]  J. Traub,et al.  Quantum algorithm and circuit design solving the Poisson equation , 2012, 1207.2485.

[22]  Stefan Heinrich,et al.  The randomized information complexity of elliptic PDE , 2006, J. Complex..

[23]  J. Yepez,et al.  Quantum Lattice-Gas Model for the Burgers Equation , 2002 .

[24]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Quantum algorithm for nonhomogeneous linear partial differential equations , 2018, Physical Review A.