Novel approach to computer modeling of seven-helical transmembrane proteins: current progress in the test case of bacteriorhodopsin.

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are thought to be proteins with 7-membered transmembrane helical bundles (7TM proteins). Recently, the X-ray structures have been solved for two such proteins, namely for bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and rhodopsin (Rh), the latter being a GPCR. Despite similarities, the structures are different enough to suggest that 3D models for different GPCRs cannot be obtained directly employing 3D structures of BR or Rh as a unique template. The approach to computer modeling of 7TM proteins developed in this work was capable of reproducing the experimental X-ray structure of BR with great accuracy. A combination of helical packing and low-energy conformers for loops most close to the X-ray structure possesses the r.m.s.d. value of 3.13 A. Such a level of accuracy for the 3D-structure prediction for a 216-residue protein has not been achieved, so far, by any available ab initio procedure of protein folding. The approach may produce also other energetically consistent combinations of helical bundles and loop conformers, creating a variety of possible templates for 3D structures of 7TM proteins, including GPCRs. These templates may provide experimentalists with various plausible options for 3D structure of a given GPCR; in our view, only experiments will determine the final choice of the most reasonable 3D template.

[1]  B. Rost,et al.  Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  A. Efimov.  [Standard conformations of a polypeptide chain in irregular protein regions]. , 1986, Molekuliarnaia biologiia.

[3]  Shigeki Mitaku,et al.  SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins , 1998, Bioinform..

[4]  A. J. Hopfinger,et al.  Conformational Properties of Macromolecules , 1973 .

[5]  G V Nikiforovich,et al.  Isolated transmembrane helices arranged across a membrane: computational studies. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[6]  G. Marshall.  Therapeutic approaches to human immunodeficiency virus: structural studies on G-protein-coupled receptors. , 1997, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[7]  G. Loew,et al.  A 3D model of the δ opioid receptor and ligand-receptor complexes , 1996 .

[8]  Standard conformations of a polypeptide chain in irregular protein regions , 1986 .

[9]  M M Gromiha.  A simple method for predicting transmembrane alpha helices with better accuracy. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[10]  J. Baldwin.  The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein‐coupled receptors. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[11]  G. Nikiforovich.  A novel, non-statistical method for predicting breaks in transmembrane helices. , 1998, Protein engineering.

[12]  M. Karplus,et al.  PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Sodroski,et al.  Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody , 1998, Nature.

[14]  C. Orengo,et al.  Analysis and assessment of ab initio three‐dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction , 1999, Proteins.

[15]  Hartmut Michel,et al.  Structure at 2.8 Å resolution of cytochrome c oxidase from Paracoccus denitrificans , 1995, Nature.

[16]  G. Loew,et al.  A 3D model of the delta opioid receptor and ligand-receptor complexes. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[17]  J Deisenhofer,et al.  Crystallographic refinement at 2.3 A resolution and refined model of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. 8. Empirical potential energy algorithm for the conformational analysis of large molecules , 1978 .

[19]  J. Soppa,et al.  Two hypotheses ‐ one answer , 1994, FEBS letters.

[20]  J U Bowie,et al.  Helix packing in membrane proteins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  S. Englander,et al.  The loop problem in proteins: A monte carlo simulated annealing approach , 1993, Biopolymers.

[22]  Gebhard F. X. Schertler,et al.  Projection structure of rhodopsin , 1993, Nature.

[23]  Luhua Lai,et al.  A fast and efficient program for modeling protein loops , 1997 .

[24]  A. Lomize,et al.  The transmembrane 7-alpha-bundle of rhodopsin: distance geometry calculations with hydrogen bonding constraints. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[25]  André Chollet,et al.  Biophysical approaches to G protein-coupled receptors: Structure, function and dynamics , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[26]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Model building by comparison at CASP3: Using expert knowledge and computer automation , 1999, Proteins.

[27]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  A simple method for predicting transmembrane α helices with better accuracy , 1999 .

[28]  A. V. Efimov,et al.  Structure of α-α-hairpins with short connections , 1991 .

[29]  I Simon,et al.  New alignment strategy for transmembrane proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  E. Jacoby,et al.  Modeling of G-protein coupled receptors with bacteriorhodopsin as a template. A novel approach based on interaction energy differences. , 1994, Journal of receptor research.

[31]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Energy parameters in polypeptides. 9. Updating of geometrical parameters, nonbonded interactions, and hydrogen bond interactions for the naturally occurring amino acids , 1983 .

[32]  A. Efimov,et al.  Structure of alpha-alpha-hairpins with short connections. , 1991, Protein engineering.

[33]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2000, Science.