Sustaining the emerging carbon trading industry development: A business ecosystem approach of carbon traders

This paper explores how carbon traders nurture the business ecosystem to sustain the emerging carbon trading industry development. We collected primary data from a multinational carbon trader and its ecosystem partners in China, through the construction of interviews and documentary. The research findings show the carbon trading industry has experienced four-stage evolution with different driving forces; the carbon trader attracted and organized ecosystem partners to facilitate the CDM project owners to create carbon credits and trade them; a systematic business ecosystems approach through the lens of Context, Cooperation and Configuration, initiated by carbon traders, has facilitated the industry development. Our findings also implicate to industrial practitioners and policymakers for sustaining the emerging industry development at both the current- and the post-Kyoto protocol periods.

[1]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming , 2006 .

[2]  Lan Xue,et al.  Evolution of collaborative innovation network in China's wind turbine manufacturing industry , 2014, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Jie Hou,et al.  Business ecosystem extension: facilitating the technology substitution , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Cheng F. Lee,et al.  Analysis of the impacts of combining carbon taxation and emission trading on different industry sectors , 2008 .

[5]  Mike Gregory,et al.  Global engineering networks: The integrating framework and key patterns , 2007 .

[6]  Jiang Yu,et al.  Linking business ecosystem lifecycle with platform strategy: a triple view of technology, application and organisation , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Daniel Bodansky,et al.  The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Postmortem , 2010, American Journal of International Law.

[8]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Carbon trading: time for industry involvement. , 2004, Environment international.

[9]  Cameron Hepburn,et al.  Carbon Trading: A Review of the Kyoto Mechanisms , 2007 .

[10]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Carbon trading in the policy mix , 2003 .

[11]  P. Williamson,et al.  Ecosystem Advantage: How to Successfully Harness the Power of Partners , 2012 .

[12]  Annouk Lievens,et al.  Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation , 2012 .

[13]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[14]  Mike Gregory,et al.  International manufacturing networks—to develop global competitive capabilities , 1998 .

[15]  Ke Rong,et al.  Nurturing business ecosystems to deal with industry uncertainties , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[16]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[17]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy safari : a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management , 1998 .

[18]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[19]  Jagjit Singh Srai,et al.  A supply network configuration perspective on international supply chain development , 2008 .

[20]  A. Hof,et al.  Analysing the greenhouse gas emission reductions of the mitigation action plans by non-Annex I countries by 2020 , 2013 .

[21]  D. Victor,et al.  A Realistic Policy on International Carbon Offsets , 2008 .

[22]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .

[23]  Manhong Shen,et al.  Determinants of clean development mechanism activity: Evidence from China , 2014 .

[24]  Carl Auerbach,et al.  Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis , 2003 .

[25]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments , 2013 .

[26]  P. Frumhoff,et al.  Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  Chao Lu,et al.  Business ecosystem and stakeholders' role transformation: Evidence from Chinese emerging electric vehicle industry , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives , 2010 .

[30]  Tek Narayan Maraseni,et al.  Selecting a CDM investor in China: A critical analysis , 2013 .

[31]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Carbon trading: Current schemes and future developments , 2011 .

[32]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[33]  Edwin Woerdman,et al.  Implementing the Kyoto protocol: why JI and CDM show more promise than international emissions trading , 2000 .

[34]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology roadmapping—A planning framework for evolution and revolution , 2004 .

[35]  Jingjing Jiang,et al.  The construction of Shenzhen׳s carbon emission trading scheme , 2014 .

[36]  Michael A. Cusumano The platform leader's dilemma , 2011, CACM.