Matched field processing localization with random sensor topologies

One of the largest challenges for multichannel localization systems is developing methodologies that are robust to interference. Unlike noise, interference is not random and often has characteristics resembling the true signals of interest. Interference often originates from multipath propagation, jamming signals, or other sources. In this paper, we demonstrate that we can significantly improve localization performance in the presence of interference through the use of a random sensor topology and matched field processing. To show this, we apply concepts and results from random matrix theory and compressed sensing. We demonstrate theoretically that random sensor topologies allow us to achieve performance characteristics similar to those of random noise. Specifically, we show that the localization performance improves, with a high probability, at a rate proportional to the number of sensors in the system. We verify these results through simulation.

[1]  Stan E Dosso,et al.  Maximum-likelihood and other processors for incoherent and coherent matched-field localization. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Kunde Yang,et al.  Matched field processing in a mismatch and multi-source environment , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[3]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Broadband localization in a dispersive medium through sparse wavenumber analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[4]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Sparse recovery of the multimodal and dispersive characteristics of Lamb waves. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[6]  J. T. Kouzmanoff,et al.  Sparse random ultrasound phased array for focal surgery , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Data-driven matched field processing for Lamb wave structural health monitoring. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Roman Vershynin,et al.  Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices , 2010, Compressed Sensing.

[9]  Claire Debever,et al.  Robust matched-field processing using a coherent broadband white noise constraint processor. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Yanping Wang,et al.  Parameters estimation using a random linear array and compressed sensing , 2010, 2010 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing.

[11]  Bin Guo,et al.  Coherence, Compressive Sensing, and Random Sensor Arrays , 2011, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[12]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Matched field processing: source localization in correlated noise as an optimum parameter estimation problem , 1988 .

[13]  David B. Harris,et al.  Superresolution with Seismic Arrays using Empirical Matched Field Processing , 2009 .

[14]  Holger Rauhut,et al.  Random Sampling of Sparse Trigonometric Polynomials, II. Orthogonal Matching Pursuit versus Basis Pursuit , 2008, Found. Comput. Math..

[15]  Holger Rauhut Stability Results for Random Sampling of Sparse Trigonometric Polynomials , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[17]  Arthur B. Baggeroer,et al.  An overview of matched field methods in ocean acoustics , 1993 .

[18]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[19]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[20]  Kung Yao,et al.  Blind beamforming on a randomly distributed sensor array system , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[21]  Yu Hen Hu,et al.  Maximum likelihood multiple-source localization using acoustic energy measurements with wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  Jeffrey L. Krolik,et al.  Matched-field estimation of aircraft altitude from multiple over-the-horizon radar revisits , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..