Dual-task interference: Attentional and neurophysiological influences

Performing two tasks simultaneously often degrades performance of one or both tasks. While this dual-task interference is classically interpreted in terms of shared attentional resources, where two motor tasks are performed simultaneously interactions within primary motor cortex (i.e., activity-dependent coupling) may also be a contributing factor. In the present study TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) was used to examine the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference during concurrent performance of a bimanual coordination task and a discrete probe reaction time (RT) task involving the foot. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that activity-dependent coupling within the leg corticomotor pathway was greater during dual-task performance than single-task performance, and this was associated with interference on the probe RT task (i.e., increased RT). Experiment 3 revealed that dual-task interference occurred regardless of whether the dual-task involved two motor tasks or a motor and cognitive task, however activity-dependent coupling was present only when a dual motor task was performed. This suggests that activity-dependent coupling is less detrimental to performance than attentional processes operating upstream of the corticomotor system. Finally, while prioritising the RT task reduced, but did not eliminate, dual-task interference the contribution of activity-dependent coupling to dual-task interference was not affected by task prioritisation. This suggests that although activity-dependent coupling may contribute to dual motor-task interference, attentional processes appear to be more important. It also suggests that activity-dependent coupling may not be subject to modulation by attentional processes.

[1]  M. Forner,et al.  Role of peripheral afference during acquisition of a complex coordination task , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic voluntary hand movement , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Reaction time differences in spatially constrained bilateral and unilateral movements , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  P. Sprent,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. , 1994 .

[5]  R. Carson,et al.  Visual feedback alters the variations in corticospinal excitability that arise from rhythmic movements of the opposite limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Hallett,et al.  Corticospinal disinhibition during dual action , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Attentional loads associated with interlimb interactions underlying rhythmic bimanual coordination , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing preferred bimanual patterns , 1999 .

[10]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[11]  J. Summers,et al.  Neural correlates of performance trade-offs and dual-task interference in bimanual coordination: An ERP investigation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Interplay of biomechanical and neuromuscular constraints on pattern stability and attentional demands in a bimanual coordination task in human subjects , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  A Semjen,et al.  Bimanual circle drawing during secondary task loading. , 1998, Motor control.

[14]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Surround inhibition in human motor system , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M Hallett,et al.  Time course of determination of movement direction in the reaction time task in humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Laurent,et al.  A dynamical framework to understand performance trade-offs and interference in dual tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Attention to Action: Specific Modulation of Corticocortical Interactions in Humans , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. Summers,et al.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  I. Franks,et al.  Spatially precise bilateral arm movements are controlled by the contralateral hemisphere , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  J. Summers,et al.  Effects of attentional prioritisation on the temporal and spatial components of an interlimb circle-drawing task. , 2005, Human movement science.

[22]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  P M Rossini,et al.  Clinical applications of motor evoked potentials. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[26]  M Schieppati,et al.  Selective facilitation of responses to cortical stimulation of proximal and distal arm muscles by precision tasks in man. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J. Summers,et al.  Attentional costs of coordinating homologous and non-homologous limbs. , 2004, Human movement science.

[28]  M. Laurent,et al.  Shared dynamics of attentional cost and pattern stability. , 2001, Human movement science.

[29]  B. Day,et al.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  W D Byblow,et al.  Excitability changes in human forearm corticospinal projections and spinal reflex pathways during rhythmic voluntary movement of the opposite limb , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  K. Mardia Statistics of Directional Data , 1972 .