The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals

This research seeks to reconcile inconsistent results obtained in prior framing research in prosocial persuasion contexts by proposing that the reference point (self or self-other) invoked in a persuasive appeal moderates the impact of a particular message frame (positive or negative) on attitudes and behavioral intentions. Two experiments were conducted in which frame and reference point were manipulated in persuasive messages promoting either recycling or prevention of HPV, a sexually transmitted disease. The results indicate that in persuasive social contexts, negative frames may be most persuasive with self-referencing appeals while positive frames work best when benefits to self as well as others are emphasized. This suggests that developers of prosocial communications should be cognizant of both the message frame and the reference point invoked in these messages in order to have maximum persuasion impact. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[2]  M. Wilson,et al.  Acquaintances, Lovers, and Friends: Rape Within Relationships1 , 2001 .

[3]  Valerie A. Clarke,et al.  Effects of Message Framing on Breast‐Cancer‐Related Beliefs and Behaviors: The Role of Mediating Factors , 2001 .

[4]  Alan G. Sawyer,et al.  The Significance of Statistical Significance Tests in Marketing Research , 1983 .

[5]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[6]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  Self-Referencing , 1989 .

[7]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals : The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[8]  Abhijit Biswas,et al.  The Recycling Cycle: An Empirical Examination of Consumer Waste Recycling and Recycling Shopping Behaviors , 2000 .

[9]  Michel Laroche,et al.  Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors , 2005 .

[10]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[12]  Carl Obermiller.  The Baby is Sick/The Baby is Well: A Test of Environmental Communication Appeals , 1995 .

[13]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior , 1994 .

[14]  Kenneth R. Lord.  Motivating recycling behavior: A quasiexperimental investigation of message and source strategies , 1994 .

[15]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Stephen S Holden,et al.  Understanding the determinants of environmentally conscious behavior , 1999 .

[17]  John R. Stuteville.  Psychic Defenses against High Fear Appeals: A Key Marketing Variable , 1970 .

[18]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Beyond Fear Appeals: Negative and Positive Persuasive Appeals to Health and Self‐Esteem , 1988 .

[19]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Message Framing Outcomes When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur , 2004 .

[20]  Margaret G. Meloy.  Mood-Driven Distortion of Product Information , 2000 .

[21]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Encoding of Personal Information: Self-Other Differences. , 1979 .

[22]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[24]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Moderators of the Impact of Self-Reference on Persuasion , 1996 .

[25]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[26]  Tamera R. Schneider,et al.  Visual and Auditory Message Framing Effects on Tobacco Smoking1 , 2001 .

[27]  Joel J. Davis.  The Effects of Message Framing on Response to Environmental Communications , 1995 .

[28]  K. Millar,et al.  Promoting Safe Driving Behaviors: The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 2000 .

[29]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Message framing and sunscreen use: gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[30]  E. Fraj,et al.  Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: an empirical analysis , 2006 .

[31]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Designing Research for Application , 1981 .

[32]  D. A. Gold,et al.  Mental representations of the self, significant others, and nonsignificant others: structure and processing of private and public aspects. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Increasing Community Recycling with Persuasive Communication and Public Commitment , 1986 .

[34]  Kenneth A. Wallston,et al.  Effects of Contract Framing, Motivation to Quit, and Self‐Efficacy on Smoking Reduction1 , 1990 .

[35]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Consumer recycling goals and their effect on decisions to recycle: A means-end chain analysis , 1994 .

[36]  Anthony D. Cox,et al.  Communicating the Consequences of Early Detection: The Role of Evidence and Framing , 2001 .

[37]  Kathleen Debevec,et al.  Self-Referent Processing in Perceptions of Verbal and Visual Commercial Information , 1992 .

[38]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion , 1995 .