Assessing the Robustness of Positive Vascular Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials Using their Fragility Index.

[1]  Y. Shargall,et al.  The fragility of significant results from randomized controlled trials in esophageal surgeries , 2023, Esophagus.

[2]  T. Forbes,et al.  Assessing the Robustness of Negative Vascular Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials Using their Reverse Fragility Index. , 2022, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  E. Azene,et al.  Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  T. Forbes,et al.  A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Vascular Surgery. , 2022, Annals of vascular surgery.

[5]  T. Forbes,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SPIN IN VASCULAR SURGERY RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS WITH NONSIGNIFICANT OUTCOMES , 2021, Journal of Vascular Surgery.

[6]  M. Al-Omran,et al.  Machine learning in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal , 2021, npj Digital Medicine.

[7]  F. Harrell,et al.  Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results , 2020, JAMA network open.

[8]  F. Crea,et al.  Characteristics of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials and Their Association With the Trial Funding Source in Invasive Cardiovascular Interventions. , 2020, JAMA internal medicine.

[9]  T. Rapanos,et al.  A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Vascular Surgery. , 2020, Annals of vascular surgery.

[10]  M. Khan,et al.  Fragility Index in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials. , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[11]  Quan-jing Chen,et al.  Efficacy of Unibody Bifurcated Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. , 2019, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[12]  E. Matteson,et al.  Treatments for giant cell arteritis: Meta-analysis and assessment of estimates reliability using the fragility index. , 2018, Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

[13]  R. Collins,et al.  Restenosis and risk of stroke after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS): secondary analysis of a randomised trial , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  Improve trial investigators,et al.  Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[15]  J. Hamming,et al.  Long‐term survival and secondary procedures after open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  J. Kane,et al.  The Fragility Index in a Cohort of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials , 2017, Journal of clinical medicine.

[17]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research , 2017, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[18]  M. Bhandari,et al.  The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Michael J Sweeting,et al.  Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[20]  T. Hölzenbein,et al.  Bioabsorbable Stent Implantation vs. Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy: Early Results of a Randomized Trial , 2014, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[21]  Andrew Burke,et al.  The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  A. Algra,et al.  Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting on Hemodynamic Complications in the International Carotid Stenting Study: A Randomized Comparison , 2014, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[23]  M. McHugh.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic , 2012, Biochemia medica.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Restenosis Is More Frequent After Carotid Stenting Than After Endarterectomy: The EVA-3S Study , 2011, Stroke.

[26]  A. Nichol,et al.  Challenging issues in randomised controlled trials. , 2010, Injury.

[27]  Mark J Sculpher,et al.  Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2011 .

[28]  H. Jäger,et al.  New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) , 2010, Lancet Neurology.

[29]  P. Dorman,et al.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[30]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. , 2009, JAMA.

[31]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[32]  L. Brown.  Patient fitness and survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients from the UK EVAR trials , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[33]  Xavier Ducrocq,et al.  Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  J Martin Bland,et al.  Restenosis After Carotid Angioplasty, Stenting, or Endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS) , 2005 .

[35]  G. Moneta,et al.  Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30-Day Operative Mortality Results: Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[36]  P R Bell,et al.  Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[37]  J. Hosking,et al.  Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: results of a prospective randomized trial. The STILE Investigators. Surgery versus Thrombolysis for Ischemia of the Lower Extremity. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[38]  Results of a prospective randomized trial evaluating surgery versus thrombolysis for ischemia of the lower extremity. The STILE trial. , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[39]  Christopher J. Tignanelli,et al.  The Fragility Index in Randomized Clinical Trials as a Means of Optimizing Patient Care , 2018, JAMA surgery.