A Modular Approach to Sustainability Assessment and Decision Support in Chemical Process Design

In chemical and allied industries, process design sustainability has gained public concern in academia, industry, government agencies, and social groups. Over the past decade, a variety of sustainability indicators have been introduced, but with various challenges in application. It becomes clear that the industries need urgently practical tools for conducting systematic sustainability assessment on existing processes and/or new designs and, further, for helping derive the most desirable design decisions. This paper presents a systematic, general approach for sustainability assessment and design selection through integrating hard (quantitative) economic and environmental indicators along with soft (qualitative) indicators for social criteria into design activities. The approach contains four modules: a process simulator module, an equipment and inventory acquisition module, a sustainability assessment module, and a decision support module. The modules fully utilize and extend the capabilities of the process simulator Aspen Plus, Aspen Simulation Workbook, and a spreadsheet, where case model development, data acquisition and analysis, team contribution assessment, and decision support are effectively integrated. The efficacy of the introduced approach is illustrated by the example of biodiesel process design, where insightful sustainability analysis and persuasive decision support show its superiority over commonly practiced technoeconomy evaluation approaches.

[1]  Z. Kravanja,et al.  Selection of the Economic Objective Function for the Optimization of Process Flow Sheets , 2006 .

[2]  H. von Blottnitz,et al.  A life-cycle comparison between inorganic and biological catalysis for the production of biodiesel , 2008 .

[3]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Assessment of four biodiesel production processes using HYSYS.Plant. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  An approach to quantitative sustainability assessment in the early stages of process design. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Joseph Fiksel,et al.  The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering , 2003 .

[6]  Hui Chen,et al.  Automating Hierarchical Environmentally-Conscious Design Using Integrated Software: VOC Recovery Case Study , 2003 .

[7]  Richard Turton,et al.  Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Processes , 2002 .

[8]  Gael D. Ulrich,et al.  A Guide to Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics , 1984 .

[9]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Rafiqul Gani,et al.  An integrated computer-aided system for generation and evaluation of sustainable process alternatives , 2003 .

[11]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Process analysis and optimization of biodiesel production from soybean oil , 2009 .

[12]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[13]  D. R. Falkenburg,et al.  A green engineering framework for concurrent design of products and processes , 1993, Proceedings of 36th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[14]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  A Hierarchical Approach for the Evaluation of Chemical Process Aspects from the Perspective of Inherent Safety , 2003 .

[16]  A. Phan,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oils , 2008 .

[17]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Hierarchical Decision Making , 2004 .

[18]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[19]  Eric R. Marsh Hierarchical Decision Making in Machine Design , 1993 .

[20]  Rafiqul Gani,et al.  Design of sustainable chemical processes: Systematic retrofit analysis generation and evaluation of alternatives , 2008 .

[21]  Iskandar Halim,et al.  Designing sustainable alternatives for batch operations using an intelligent simulation–optimization framework , 2008 .

[22]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  Sustainability evaluation of biodiesel production using multicriteria decision‐making , 2009 .

[23]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  A Methodology for Integrating Sustainability Considerations into Process Design , 2006 .

[24]  Yan Zhiguo,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Environmental and Economic Performance of Chemical Products Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach , 2007 .

[25]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Decision framework for chemical process design including different stages of environmental, health, and safety assessment , 2008 .

[26]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Indicators of Sustainable Development for Industry: A General Framework , 2000 .

[27]  P. Piumsomboon,et al.  LCA studies comparing biodiesel synthesized by conventional and supercritical methanol methods , 2009 .

[28]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  Quality criteria for process design in the design process — industrial case studies and an expert panel , 1998 .

[29]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Engineering for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Bio-Diesel Production , 2007 .

[30]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Designing sustainable processes with simulation: the waste reduction (WAR) algorithm , 1999 .

[31]  Chonghun Han,et al.  Design and Economic Analysis of the Process for Biodiesel Fuel Production from Transesterificated Rapeseed Oil Using Supercritical Methanol , 2009 .

[32]  van Jmn Han Kasteren,et al.  A process model to estimate the cost of industrial scale biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by supercritical transesterification , 2007 .