Prognostic significance of progression of coronary artery disease.

Angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD) can progress. Although progression itself is frequently recognized in patients who have undergone repeat cardiac catheterization, its prognostic significance remains unclear. To evaluate the influence of progression on survival, 313 patients with CAD who underwent catheterization twice (39 +/- 25 months apart) were followed for 3 to 129 months (mean 41 +/- 30) after the second angiogram. At the time of the second angiogram, 21, 91, 113 and 88 patients had 0-, 1-, 2- and 3-vessel CAD, respectively. The mean ejection fraction (EF) of the group was 55 +/- 13%. Progression was noted in 139 patients (44%). Of the 313 patients, 33 died and 39 had acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during follow-up. Four-year survival was estimated at 94% and 83% in the nonprogression and progression groups, respectively. Progression was predictive of survival by (univariate) long-rank test (p less than 0.01), but only EF (p less than 0.001), number of diseased vessels (p less than 0.01) and percent stenosis in the left main coronary artery (p less than 0.05) were independently significant by (multivariate) Cox regression analysis. Four-year survival without AMI was 89% and 73% in the nonprogression and progression groups, respectively. Progression was related to survival without AMI (p less than 0.001) by log-rank test. Cox regression analysis provided 3 independent predictors of survival without AMI: number of diseased vessels (p less than 0.01), progression (p less than 0.01), relative risk = 2.28) and EF (p less than 0.01). Results were similar when analyzing only the 39 AMIs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  M J Davies,et al.  Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Bruschke,et al.  The Anatomic Evolution of Coronary Artery Disease Demonstrated by Coronary Arteriography in 256 Nonoperated Patients , 1981, Circulation.

[3]  F. Harrell,et al.  An improving prognosis over time in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. , 1983, American Journal of Cardiology.

[4]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[5]  R. Gorlin,et al.  Progression of Coronary Artery Disease: A Clinical Arteriographic Study , 1973, British heart journal.

[6]  L. Clark,et al.  Acute pulmonary edema due to ischemic heart disease without accompanying myocardial infarction. Natural history and clinical profile. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[7]  J. Kramer,et al.  Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1981, Circulation.

[8]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Effect of Perioperative Myocardial Infarction on Late Survival in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 1982, Circulation.

[9]  D. Stablein,et al.  Survival analysis of drug combinations using a hazards model with time-dependent covariates. , 1980, Biometrics.

[10]  F. Harrell,et al.  The prognosis for patients with new-onset angina who have undergone cardiac catheterization. , 1983, Circulation.

[11]  L. Smith,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography. Coronary anatomy of patients with unstable angina pectoris reexamined 1 year after optimal medical therapy. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  F. Harrell,et al.  Survival in medically treated coronary artery disease. , 1979, Circulation.

[13]  E L Bolson,et al.  Arteriographic assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. Review of current methods, their limitations, and clinical applications. , 1982, Arteriosclerosis.

[14]  R. O'rourke,et al.  Clinical pathologic correlates in acute myocardial infarction. , 1978, Advances in cardiology.

[15]  S. Goldstein.  The necessity of a uniform definition of sudden coronary death: witnessed death within 1 hour of the onset of acute symptoms. , 1982, American heart journal.

[16]  M. Bourassa,et al.  Selective coronary arteriography by the percutaneous femoral artery approach. , 1969, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[17]  D. Kramsch,et al.  Atherosclerosis: Prevention by agents not affecting abnormal levels of blood lipids. , 1981, Science.

[18]  Yves Taeymans,et al.  Clinical and Angiographic Factors Associated With Coronary Artery Disease Progression of Coronary Artery Disease , 1984 .

[19]  S H Brooks,et al.  Reproducibility of a consensus panel in the interpretation of coronary angiograms. , 1978, American heart journal.

[20]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. , 1979, Circulation.

[21]  A. Bruschke,et al.  Progress Study of 590 Consecutive Nonsurgical Cases of Coronary Disease Followed 5–9 Years: II. Ventriculographic and Other Correlations , 1973, Circulation.

[22]  D. Waters,et al.  Unstable angina and progression of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.