Single-trial P3 amplitude and latency informed event-related fMRI models yield different BOLD response patterns to a target detection task

Using single-trial parameters as a regressor in the General Linear Model (GLM) is becoming an increasingly popular method for informing fMRI analysis. However, the parameter used to characterise or to differentiate brain regions involved in the response to a particular task varies across studies (e.g. ERP amplitude, ERP latency, reaction time). Furthermore, the way in which the single-trial information is used in the fMRI analysis is also important. For example, the single-trial parameters can be used as regressors in the GLM or to modify the duration of the events modelled in the GLM. The aim of this study was to investigate the BOLD response to a target detection task when including P3 amplitude, P3 latency and reaction time parameters in the GLM. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI was recorded from fifteen subjects in response to a visual choice reaction time task. Including P3 amplitude as a regressor in the GLM yielded activation in left central opercular cortex, left postcentral gyrus, left insula, left middle frontal gyrus, left insula and left parietal operculum. Using P3 latency and reaction time as an additional regressor yielded no additional activation in comparison with the conventional fMRI analysis. However, when P3 latency or reaction time was used to determine the duration of events at a single-trial level, additional activation was observed in the left postcentral gyrus, left precentral gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex and supramarginal gyrus. Our findings suggest that ERP amplitudes and latencies can yield different activation patterns when used to modify relevant aspects of the GLM.

[1]  Mark A Elliott,et al.  Hemodynamic responses in neural circuitries for detection of visual target and novelty: An event‐related fMRI study , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Mental chronometry using latency-resolved functional MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  P. Stoeter,et al.  Association of attentional network function with exon 5 variations of the CHRNA4 gene. , 2007, Human molecular genetics.

[4]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Jonathan Berger,et al.  Neural Dynamics of Event Segmentation in Music: Converging Evidence for Dissociable Ventral and Dorsal Networks , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  F Barkhof,et al.  Nonlinear Changes in Brain Activity During Continuous Word Repetition: An Event-Related Multiparametric Functional MR Imaging Study , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  M. Scherg,et al.  Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Novelty and target processing during an auditory novelty oddball: A simultaneous event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alfons Schnitzler,et al.  Laser-evoked potential P2 single-trial amplitudes covary with the fMRI BOLD response in the medial pain system and interconnected subcortical structures , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Jürgen Fell,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology: Beyond averaging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Andrew P. Bagshaw,et al.  Single trial variability of EEG and fMRI responses to visual stimuli , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. Roth,et al.  Single‐trial analysis of oddball event‐related potentials in simultaneous EEG‐fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Godfrey Pearlson,et al.  An adaptive reflexive processing model of neurocognitive function: supporting evidence from a large scale (n = 100) fMRI study of an auditory oddball task , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  E. Halgren,et al.  Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  Peter Stoeter,et al.  Distributed BOLD-response in association cortex vector state space predicts reaction time during selective attention , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  Mark H. Ellisman,et al.  Serial Section Electron Tomography: A Method for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Large Structures , 1994, NeuroImage.

[24]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[25]  D. Javitt,et al.  Neurophysiological biomarkers for drug development in schizophrenia , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Correlations and dissociations between BOLD signal and P300 amplitude in an auditory oddball task: a parametric approach to combining fMRI and ERP. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  Luciano Gamberini,et al.  Selective activation of the superior frontal gyrus in task-switching: An event-related fNIRS study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. D. Connolly,et al.  fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  S. Hsieh,et al.  The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Turner,et al.  Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  Christian Seifert,et al.  Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[37]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Goebel,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain I Time-Resolved fMRI during Visuospatial Mental Imagery , 2002, Neuron.

[40]  Shulan Hsieh,et al.  Exploring the nature of switch cost: inferences from P300 and the lateralized readiness potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[41]  P. Sajda,et al.  EEG-Informed fMRI Reveals Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Perceptual Decision Making , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Combined distributed source and single-trial EEG–fMRI modeling: Application to effortful decision making processes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  E. Rolls,et al.  Computational models of schizophrenia and dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Engel,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.12 Single-trial EEG–fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function , 2022 .

[45]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  Judith M. Ford,et al.  Delayed hemodynamic responses in schizophrenia , 2005, NeuroImage.

[49]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[51]  Natalie A. Phillips,et al.  Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of task switching during single and mixed-task conditions , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[52]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[53]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[55]  Alfons Schnitzler,et al.  Fluctuations in electrodermal activity reveal variations in single trial brain responses to painful laser stimuli — A fMRI/EEG study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[56]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.