Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials

SummaryThe accuracy of a yield trial can be increased by improved experimental techniques, more replicates, or more efficient statistical analyses. The third option involves nominal fixed costs, and is therefore very attractive. The statistical analysis recommended here combines the Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model with a predictive assessment of accuracy. AMMI begins with the usual analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compute genotype and environment additive effects. It then applies principal components analysis (PCA) to analyze non-additive interaction effects. Tests with a New York soybean yield trial show that the predictive accuracy of AMMI with only two replicates is equal to the predictive accuracy of means based on five replicates. The effectiveness of AMMI increases with the size of the yield trial and with the noisiness of the data. Statistical analysis of yield trials with the AMMI model has a number of promising implications for agronomy and plant breeding research programs.

[1]  H. Gauch Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction , 1988 .

[2]  Geoffrey Hellman,et al.  Reason and prediction , 1975 .

[3]  J. Geweke,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting , 2004 .

[4]  J. Aitchison,et al.  Statistical Prediction Analysis , 1975 .

[5]  F. Cady,et al.  Intersite Transfer of Estimated Response Surfaces , 1981 .

[6]  G. W. Snedecor Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[7]  L. Gusmão Inadequacy of blocking in cultivar yield trials , 1986, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[8]  R. W. Burchfield,et al.  A supplement to the Oxford English dictionary , 1976 .

[9]  K. Ruben Gabriel,et al.  The Biplot as a Diagnostic Tool for Models of Two-Way Tables , 1978 .

[10]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Noise Reduction By Eigenvector Ordinations , 1982 .

[11]  M. Talbot Yield variability of crop varieties in the U.K. , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[12]  R. Kempton The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[13]  D. Bradu,et al.  Response surface model diagnosis in two-way tables , 1984 .

[14]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Statistical Analysis of a Yield Trial , 1988 .

[15]  Student,et al.  On Testing Varieties of Cereals , 1923 .

[16]  J. Mandel A New Analysis of Variance Model for Non-additive Data , 1971 .

[17]  K. W. Finlay,et al.  The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme , 1963 .

[18]  Foster B. Cady,et al.  Combining Experiments to Predict Future Yield Data1 , 1972 .

[19]  Joint analysis of genotypic and environmental effects , 1986, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  H. F. Gollob,et al.  A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques , 1968, Psychometrika.

[21]  L. Gusmão An adequate design for regression analysis of yield trials , 1985, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[22]  A. J. Wright The analysis and prediction of some two factor interactions in grass breeding , 1971, The Journal of Agricultural Science.