Using Stakeholders' Views: A Social Science Methodology for the Inclusive Design of Environmental Communications

Environmental education and communications may not be received openly by some audiences on the grounds that content represents only one perspective on an issue. Accordingly there is increasing appreciation of the need to recognize and include diverse groups' perspectives when designing environmental communications in order to reach and affect broad audiences with differing backgrounds and beliefs. This article describes a research methodology developed in response to these needs that was applied in a project to create a master plan for wetlands education in the Greater Great Salt Lake ecosystem. The research design uses focus group and social research survey methods to gather information about the diverse perspectives held by stakeholder groups and the general public, as well as their knowledge of and attitudes toward a contentious natural resource issue. The information can be used to determine what environmental communication messages need to be developed and how best to deliver them. The methodology described can be used for the inclusive development of environmental communications that have the potential to affect diverse audiences. [environmental education, environmental communication, stakeholder, wetland education, public involvement]

[1]  V. Richardson,et al.  Constructivist Pedagogy , 2003, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[2]  H. Hungerford CONVERSATIONS WITH…: Environmental Educators A Conversation With Rick Wilke , 2002 .

[3]  C. Lundmark Keeping Track of Wetland Restorations , 2001 .

[4]  S. J. Hudson Challenges for Environmental Education: Issues and Ideas for the 21st Century , 2001 .

[5]  R. Holsman VIEWPOINT: The Politics of Environmental Education , 2001 .

[6]  R. Holsman THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION , 2001 .

[7]  Alan Colburn,et al.  Constructivism: Science Education's “Grand Unifying Theory” , 2000 .

[8]  J. Wertsch,et al.  CONSTRUCTIVISM IN EDUCATION , 2019 .

[9]  J. Valenti Ethical Decision Making in Environmental Communication , 1998 .

[10]  Mark W. Brunson,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Social Science Contributions to Ecosystem Management , 1998 .

[11]  A Reflexive Model for Collaboration , 1998 .

[12]  Nancy W. Coppola Rhetorical Analysis of Stakeholders in Environmental Communication: A Model , 1997 .

[13]  D. Decker,et al.  From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management , 1996 .

[14]  C. Cocklin,et al.  Institutional and Landowner Perspectives on Wetland Management in New Zealand , 1995 .

[15]  M. Carroll,et al.  Your place or mine?: the effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings , 1995 .

[16]  L. Steffe,et al.  Constructivism in education. , 1995 .

[17]  Neil L. Anstead Hooking Kids with Humanities. , 1993 .

[18]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data , 1992 .

[19]  Robert B. Riley Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape , 1992 .

[20]  S. Shamai Sense of place: an empirical measurement , 1991 .

[21]  T. Dahl,et al.  Wetlands Losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's , 1990 .

[22]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[23]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[24]  S. Talbot Desecration and American Indian Religious Freedom. , 1985 .

[25]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[26]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[27]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .