Prevalence of Abusive Fractures of the Hands, Feet, Spine, or Pelvis on Skeletal Survey: Perhaps “Uncommon” Is More Common Than Suggested

Objective Recently, it has been suggested that views of the hands, feet, spine, and pelvis should be omitted from routine skeletal surveys (SSs) because these fractures are rarely identified by SS. Our objective was to describe the prevalence of fractures to the hands, feet, spine, or pelvis among SSs obtained for children in a large, multicenter population who underwent consultation for physical abuse. Methods This was a retrospective secondary analysis of data from the Examining Siblings To Recognize Abuse research network, a consortium of 20 US child abuse teams who collected data for all children younger than 10 years who underwent consultation for concerns of physical abuse. This secondary analysis included data only from index children and excluded data from siblings and contacts. Consulting child abuse physicians reported the number of fractures identified and those that were detected by SS. Results Among 2049 initial SSs, 471 (23.0%) showed at least 1 previously unknown fracture including 49 (10.4%) that showed a fracture to the hands, feet, spine, or pelvis. In 10 cases, the SS identified at least 1 fracture of the hands, feet, spine, or pelvis when no other fractures were identified. Conclusions A significant number of occult, abusive fractures would have been missed if SSs had omitted or deferred views of the hands, feet, spine, and pelvis. Given the risks associated with missed abuse, these views should be routinely included in the radiographic SS.

[1]  E. Blood,et al.  Prevalence of Abusive Injuries in Siblings and Household Contacts of Physically Abused Children , 2012, Pediatrics.

[2]  A. Offiah The Prevalence of Uncommon Fractures on Skeletal Surveys Performed to Evaluate for Suspected Abuse in 930 Children: Should Practice Guidelines Change? , 2012 .

[3]  David L Schriger,et al.  Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  R. Berger,et al.  Use of Skeletal Surveys to Evaluate for Physical Abuse: Analysis of 703 Consecutive Skeletal Surveys , 2011, Pediatrics.

[5]  Kristine A. Campbell,et al.  How useful are skeletal surveys in the second year of life? , 2009, Child abuse & neglect.

[6]  Section on Radiology Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse , 2009, Pediatrics.

[7]  P. Kirby,et al.  Fatal Abusive Head Trauma Cases: Consequence of Medical Staff Missing Milder Forms of Physical Abuse , 2008, Pediatric emergency care.

[8]  J. Thackeray Frena tears and abusive head injury: a cautionary tale. , 2007, Pediatric emergency care.

[9]  K. Barlow,et al.  Late Neurologic and Cognitive Sequelae of Inflicted Traumatic Brain Injury in Infancy , 2005, Pediatrics.

[10]  F. Putnam,et al.  Outcomes of infants and children with inflicted traumatic brain injury. , 2003, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[11]  R. Belfer,et al.  Use of the skeletal survey in the evaluation of child maltreatment. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[12]  P. Kleinman Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse , 1987 .

[13]  A. Ritzén,et al.  Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. , 1999, JAMA.

[14]  Y. Sato,et al.  Serial abuse in children who are shaken. , 1990, American journal of diseases of children.

[15]  K. Norris,et al.  Value of radiologic skeletal survey in assessment of abused children. , 1984, Pediatrics.

[16]  M. A. Radkowski,et al.  The abused child: a radiological reappraisal. , 1983, Radiology.