Epistemology and Methodology in Case Research: A Comparison between European and American IS Journals

The case study is an important research method in Information Systems research. It enables us to study contemporary and complex social phenomena in their natural context and is one of the most widely used qualitative research methods in the field. Case studies are used in both the positivist and the interpretist epistemological tradition. Studies on the evaluation of case research tend to focus on only one of these epistemological standpoints and tend to have a North American bias when it comes to journal selection. This study evaluates 62 case studies that have been published in North American and European top journals and that have been conducted from both epistemological stances. In this study I compare papers published in American and European journals on epistemology, methodology and pluralism with respect to other sciences such as sociology, psychology or history. The evaluation is done in the qualitative tradition (because it concerns qualitative studies). In this way it provides IS researchers with a colourful palette with which they can paint their own case study designs and reports.

[1]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Towards dissolution of the is research debate: from polarization to polarity , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Erik J. De Vries,et al.  Case Research in IS: State of Affairs , 1999, ECIS.

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[7]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for MIS scholars , 1997, CACM.

[9]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[12]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[13]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Research Commentary. Academic Rewards for Teaching, Research, and Service: Data and Discourse , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .