Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: Role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux

Abstract Reverse osmosis (RO) is being increasingly used in treatment of domestic wastewater secondary effluent for potable and non-potable reuse. Among other solutes, dissolved biopolymers, i.e., proteins and polysaccharides, can lead to severe fouling of RO membranes. In this study, the roles of RO membrane surface properties in membrane fouling by two model biopolymers, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and sodium alginate, were investigated. Three commercial RO membranes with different surface properties were tested in a laboratory-scale cross-flow RO system. Membrane surface properties considered include surface roughness, zeta potential, and hydrophobicity. Experimental results revealed that membrane surface roughness had the greatest effect on fouling by the biopolymers tested. Accordingly, modified membranes with smoother surfaces showed significantly lower fouling rates. When Ca 2+ was present, alginate fouled RO membranes much faster than BSA. Considerable synergistic effect was observed when both BSA and alginate were present. The larger foulant particle sizes measured in the co-existence of BSA and alginate indicate formation of BSA-alginate aggregates, which resulted in greater fouling rates. Faster initial flux decline was observed at higher initial permeate flux even when the flux was measured against accumulative permeate volume, indicating a negative impact of higher operating pressure.

[1]  Kimberly L. Jones,et al.  Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength , 2000 .

[2]  A. Zydney,et al.  Effects of intermolecular thiol–disulfide interchange reactions on bsa fouling during microfiltration , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  D. Stuckey,et al.  Production of Soluble Microbial Products (SMP) in an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor: Composition, Biodegradability, and the Effect of Process Parameters , 1998 .

[4]  A. Navon,et al.  An Edible-to-insects Calcium Alginate Gel as a Carrier for Entomopathogenic Nematodes , 1998 .

[5]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  The effect of protein fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration on permeate flux, protein retention and selectivity: A literature review , 1993 .

[6]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. , 2004, Water research.

[7]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Water from (waste)water--the dependable water resource. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Keehoon Won,et al.  Optimization of lipase entrapment in Ca-alginate gel beads , 2005 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[10]  S. Bhattacharjee,et al.  A Novel Asymmetric Clamping Cell for Measuring Streaming Potential of Flat Surfaces , 2002 .

[11]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[12]  Eun Namkung,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of Microbial Product Formation in Biological Processes , 1987 .

[13]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization☆ , 1998 .

[14]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[15]  M. Rebhun,et al.  Classification of organics in secondary effluents , 1971 .

[16]  Marilyn Barger,et al.  FOULING PREDICTION IN REVERSE OSMOSIS PROCESSES , 1991 .

[17]  Z. Cui,et al.  In situ three-dimensional characterization of membrane fouling by protein suspensions using multiphoton microscopy. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration , 1994 .

[19]  Pedro Prádanos,et al.  The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration , 2000 .

[20]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[21]  Sema Salgın,et al.  A Parametric Study on Protein‐Membrane‐Ionic Environment Interactions for Membrane Fouling , 2005 .

[22]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration , 1995 .

[23]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Colloidal Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Measurements and Fouling Mechanisms , 1997 .