Evaluation of On-Board Photovoltaic Modules Options for Electric Vehicles

This paper presents an overview of different commercial photovoltaic (PV) module options to power on-board electric vehicles (EVs). We propose the evaluation factors, constraints, and the decision-making criteria necessary to assess the suitability of this PV module for this application. The incorporation of quality function deployment (QFD) and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is the decision-making methodology used in this study. Our approach is innovative and robust in that the evaluation depends upon data collected from PV manufactures datasheets. Unlike traditional research, a hybrid AHP and QFD innovative decision-making methodology has been created, and current commercial PV market data for all pairwise comparisons are used to show that methodology. Using both cooled and uncooled PV modules, best, intermediate, and worst-case scenarios were used to estimate the driving ranges of lightweight EVs powered exclusively by bulk silicon PV modules. Results showed that the available daily driving ranges were between 25 and 60 km and that the CO2 emissions were reduced between 3 and 6.5 kg, compared with internal combustion vehicles of a similar type. We found that mono-Si PV modules were most suited to power low-speed, lightweight, and aerodynamically efficient EVs.

[1]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[2]  Michael Ritthoff,et al.  Photovoltaics and the RoHS Directive , 2010 .

[3]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[4]  Rajendra Singh Why silicon is and will remain the dominant photovoltaic material , 2009 .

[5]  Mahmoud Abdelhamid,et al.  Review of Microcrack Detection Techniques for Silicon Solar Cells , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[6]  Vincenzo Naddeo,et al.  Sustainable power plants: A support tool for the analysis of alternatives , 2014 .

[7]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of a Series Hybrid CNG Vehicle , 2014 .

[8]  G. F. Alapatt,et al.  Making Solar Cells a Reality in Every Home: Opportunities and Challenges for Photovoltaic Device Design , 2013, IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society.

[9]  J. D. Leslie,et al.  Economic requirements for new materials for solar photovoltaic cells , 1980 .

[11]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Vehicle Propulsion Systems: Introduction to Modeling and Optimization , 2005 .

[12]  Mahmoud Abdelhamid,et al.  Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White , 2011 .

[13]  V. Chandrasekhar,et al.  MCDM approach for selecting suitable solar tracking system , 2013, 2013 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO).

[14]  Luciane Neves Canha,et al.  Real‐Time Reconfiguration of Distribution Network with Distributed Generation , 2014 .

[15]  R. Singh,et al.  Global green energy conversion revolution in 21st century through solid state devices , 2008, 2008 26th International Conference on Microelectronics.

[16]  C. Rydh,et al.  Energy analysis of batteries in photovoltaic systems. Part I: Performance and energy requirements , 2005 .

[17]  Eric W. Stein,et al.  A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies , 2013 .

[18]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[19]  R. Singh,et al.  Green energy conversion & storage for solving India's energy problem through innovation in ultra large scale manufacturing and advanced research of solid state devices and systems , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Emerging Electronics.

[20]  W. Warta,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 43) , 2014 .

[21]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects , 2014 .

[23]  Joule A. Bergerson,et al.  Internalizing land use impacts for life cycle cost analysis of energy systems: A case of California’s photovoltaic implementation , 2014 .

[24]  A. Azeem,et al.  Selection of the most appropriate package of Solar Home System using Analytic Hierarchy Process model in rural areas of Bangladesh , 2013 .

[25]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Incorporating quality function deployment and analytical hierarchy process in a knowledge-based system for automotive production line design , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[26]  Paulo Augusto Cauchick Miguel,et al.  Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD—Types of research, difficulties and benefits , 2008 .

[27]  S. Beaupré,et al.  High Efficiency Polymer Solar Cells with Long Operating Lifetimes , 2011 .

[28]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[30]  C. Rydh Energy Analysis of Batteries in Photovoltaic Systems , 2003 .

[31]  Simon French Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..