Comparison of airflow and particulate matter transport in multi-room buildings for different natural ventilation patterns

Abstract This study numerically investigates airflow characteristics and particulate matter (PM) transport in multi-room buildings for different natural ventilation patterns with the same air change rate. Four typical natural ventilation patterns (full-open, pass-through, right short-circuit and left short-circuit), representing the ratios of the outlet-to-inlet opening size ranging from 1.67 to 0.17, are considered to study multi-room airflow characteristics. A measured indoor PM10 profile in Taipei Metropolis is input into the above four ventilation patterns as the initial condition of the PM size distribution. The time variation of indoor PM10/PM2.5/PM1 concentrations in each room for various ventilation patterns is next investigated. The effect of ventilation pattern on particle removal mechanism is emphasized. The results show that although the air change rate of the building is the same, airflow characteristics and PM transport behaviors are quite different for various ventilation patterns. The removal efficiencies of PM10 for the four ventilation patterns are all found to be much better than those of PM2.5 and PM1. Particle escape is the major mechanism to remove PM for rooms with double-sided ventilation, whereas particle deposition is important for single-sided ventilation rooms.

[1]  Derek Dunn-Rankin,et al.  Measurement and prediction of indoor air flow in a model room , 2003 .

[2]  T. Chang,et al.  Gravitational fall velocity of sphere in viscous fluid , 1998 .

[3]  B. Launder,et al.  THE NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF TURBULENT FLOW , 1974 .

[4]  M. P. Wan,et al.  Transport and Removal of Expiratory Droplets in Hospital Ward Environment , 2008 .

[5]  M Lippmann,et al.  Respiratory hospital admissions and summertime haze air pollution in Toronto, Ontario: consideration of the role of acid aerosols. , 1994, Environmental research.

[6]  T. Chang,et al.  Numerical Study of the Effect of Ventilation Pattern on Coarse, Fine, and Very Fine Particulate Matter Removal in Partitioned Indoor Environment , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  S. Konishi,et al.  A new approach based on a covariance structure model to source apportionment of indoor fine particles in Tokyo , 1994 .

[8]  Wei-Zhen Lu,et al.  Numerical analysis of indoor aerosol particle deposition and distribution in two-zone ventilation system , 1996 .

[9]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Study of natural ventilation in buildings with large eddy simulation , 2001 .

[10]  Tsang-Jung Chang,et al.  Quantitative Prediction of Traffic Pollutant Transmission into Buildings , 2003, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[11]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method , 2004 .

[12]  Hazim B. Awbi,et al.  Effect of internal partitioning on indoor air quality of rooms with mixing ventilation—basic study , 2004 .

[13]  Lance Wallace,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Ultrafine, Fine, and Coarse Particles in a Residence for 18 Months in 1999-2000 , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[14]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Deposition of aerosols on surfaces in a turbulent channel flow , 1993 .

[15]  H. Kao,et al.  Numerical investigation of airflow pattern and particulate matter transport in naturally ventilated multi-room buildings. , 2006, Indoor air.

[16]  T. Chang,et al.  Transport mechanisms of airborne particulate matters in partitioned indoor environment , 2008 .

[17]  C. Lachenmyer,et al.  Urban Measurements of Outdoor-Indoor PM2.5 Concentrations and Personal Exposure in the Deep South. Part I. Pilot Study of Mass Concentrations for Nonsmoking Subjects , 2000 .

[18]  Kee-Chiang Chung,et al.  Predicting contaminant particle distributions to evaluate the environment of lavatories with floor exhaust ventilation , 1997 .

[19]  Chihshan Li.  Elemental composition of residential indoor PM10 in the urban atmosphere of Taipei , 1994 .

[20]  Christopher Yu Hang Chao,et al.  Residential indoor PM10 and PM2.5 in Hong Kong and the elemental composition , 2002 .

[21]  K. Chung,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of airflow and contaminant particle transport in a partitioned enclosure , 1998 .

[22]  J. Burnett,et al.  A territory wide survey on indoor particulate level in Hong Kong , 1998 .

[23]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Using large eddy simulation to study particle motions in a room. , 2005, Indoor air.

[24]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Modelling and measurement of airflow and aerosol particle distribution in a ventilated two-zone chamber , 1996 .

[25]  D. Abbey,et al.  Chronic respiratory symptoms associated with estimated long-term ambient concentrations of fine particulates less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and other air pollutants. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[26]  T. Chang,et al.  Transport Mechanisms of Coarse, Fine, and Very Fine Particulate Matter in Urban Street Canopies with Different Building Layouts , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[27]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Large eddy simulation of indoor airflow with a filtered dynamic subgrid scale model , 2000 .

[28]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[29]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on particle distribution in a two-zone chamber , 2007, Atmospheric Environment.

[30]  J. Sarnat,et al.  Analysis of PM10, PM2.5, and PM2.5–10Concentrations in Santiago, Chile, from 1989 to 2001 , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[32]  Tsang-Jung Chang,et al.  Numerical Evaluation of the Effect of Traffic Pollution on Indoor Air Quality of a Naturally Ventilated Building , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.