Dynamical Transitions in a One-Dimensional Katz–Lebowitz–Spohn Model

Dynamical transitions, already found in the high- and low-density phases of the Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process and a couple of its generalizations, are singularities in the rate of relaxation towards the Non-Equilibrium Stationary State (NESS), which do not correspond to any transition in the NESS itself. We investigate dynamical transitions in the one-dimensional Katz–Lebowitz–Spohn model, a further generalization of the Totally Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process where the hopping rate depends on the occupation state of the 2 nodes adjacent to the nodes affected by the hop. Following previous work, we choose Glauber rates and bulk-adapted boundary conditions. In particular, we consider a value of the repulsion which parameterizes the Glauber rates such that the fundamental diagram of the model exhibits 2 maxima and a minimum, and the NESS phase diagram is especially rich. We provide evidence, based on pair approximation, domain wall theory and exact finite size results, that dynamical transitions also occur in the one-dimensional Katz–Lebowitz–Spohn model, and discuss 2 new phenomena which are peculiar to this model.

[1]  A. Pipkin,et al.  Kinetics of biopolymerization on nucleic acid templates , 1968, Biopolymers.

[2]  T. Chou,et al.  Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics: from a paradigmatic model to biological transport , 2011, 1110.1783.

[3]  A. Kolomeisky,et al.  Theoretical investigations of asymmetric simple exclusion processes for interacting oligomers , 2018, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment.

[4]  M. Pretti,et al.  Dynamical transitions in a driven diffusive model with interactions , 2018, EPL (Europhysics Letters).

[5]  F. Essler,et al.  Exact spectral gaps of the asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries , 2006, cond-mat/0609645.

[6]  B. Derrida,et al.  Exact solution of a 1d asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation , 1993 .

[7]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Totally asymmetric simple exclusion process with Langmuir kinetics. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Alessandro Pelizzola,et al.  Cluster Variation Method in Statistical Physics and Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2005, ArXiv.

[9]  B. Derrida AN EXACTLY SOLUBLE NON-EQUILIBRIUM SYSTEM : THE ASYMMETRIC SIMPLE EXCLUSION PROCESS , 1998 .

[10]  ben-Avraham,et al.  Mean-field (n,m)-cluster approximation for lattice models. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[11]  F. Essler,et al.  Bethe ansatz solution of the asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  Schutz,et al.  Asymmetric exclusion process with next-nearest-neighbor interaction: some comments on traffic flow and a nonequilibrium reentrance transition , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  A. Kolomeisky,et al.  Effect of interactions for one-dimensional asymmetric exclusion processes under periodic and bath-adapted coupling environment , 2018 .

[14]  J. H. Gibbs,et al.  Concerning the kinetics of polypeptide synthesis on polyribosomes , 1969 .

[15]  Spectra of non-hermitian quantum spin chains describing boundary induced phase transitions , 1996, cond-mat/9611163.

[16]  M. Pretti,et al.  Cluster approximations for the TASEP: stationary state and dynamical transition , 2017, 1710.10873.

[17]  M. Evans,et al.  Dynamical transition in the open-boundary totally asymmetric exclusion process , 2010, 1010.5741.

[18]  M. Pretti,et al.  Dynamical transition in the TASEP with Langmuir kinetics: mean-field theory , 2018, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[19]  G. Schütz 1 – Exactly Solvable Models for Many-Body Systems Far from Equilibrium , 2001 .

[20]  Krug,et al.  Boundary-induced phase transitions in driven diffusive systems. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[21]  Herbert Spohn,et al.  Nonequilibrium steady states of stochastic lattice gas models of fast ionic conductors , 1984 .

[22]  F. Essler,et al.  Slowest relaxation mode of the partially asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries , 2008, 0806.3493.

[23]  Nagel,et al.  Discrete stochastic models for traffic flow. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems: From Molecules to Vehicles , 2010 .

[25]  P. Maass,et al.  One-dimensional transport of interacting particles: currents, density profiles, phase diagrams, and symmetries. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  G. Schütz,et al.  Relaxation spectrum of the asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries , 2000 .

[27]  Philipp Maass,et al.  Classical driven transport in open systems with particle interactions and general couplings to reservoirs. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[28]  G. Schütz,et al.  Finite-lattice extrapolation algorithms , 1988 .

[29]  J. Stoer,et al.  Fehlerabschätzungen und Extrapolation mit rationalen Funktionen bei Verfahren vom Richardson-Typus , 1964 .

[30]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Phase coexistence in driven one-dimensional transport. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[31]  Laxmidhar Behera,et al.  Neighborhood Approximations for Non-Linear Voter Models , 2015, Entropy.

[32]  Eytan Domany,et al.  An exact solution of a one-dimensional asymmetric exclusion model with open boundaries , 1992 .

[33]  Guozhong An A note on the cluster variation method , 1988 .

[34]  E. Domany,et al.  Phase transitions in an exactly soluble one-dimensional exclusion process , 1993, cond-mat/9303038.