A risk-constrained and energy efficient stochastic approach for autonomous overtaking

In this paper a control approach for safe and energy efficient autonomous overtaking is presented. The proposed method combines a stochastic approach based on the use of safety indicators as the Time headway (TH) and Time to collision (TTC) as boundary conditions and a cost index on fuel consumption for the trajectory of an Ego vehicle in a traffic environment. The approach has been evaluated in two typical overtaking scenarios: 1) braking of the leading vehicle and 2) entry of a third vehicle in the gap between the leading and the ego vehicle. The efficiency of TH and TTC- based stochastic approach have been compared for the same maximal risk threshold. Results show that both risk function are suitable to perform overtaking manoeuvres both with and without an additive fuel cost. Moreover the TTC–based stochastic approach shows a reduction of about 5{%} in fuel consumption with respect to the TH-based approach for both considered scenarios.

[1]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Automated driving: The role of forecasts and uncertainty - A control perspective , 2015, Eur. J. Control.

[2]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[3]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Predictive cruise control with autonomous overtaking , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  Jin Li-sheng,et al.  Research on safety lane change model of driver assistant system on highway , 2009, 2009 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[5]  S. Lauritzen Propagation of Probabilities, Means, and Variances in Mixed Graphical Association Models , 1992 .

[6]  Harald Waschl,et al.  Cooperative adaptive cruise control applying stochastic linear model predictive control strategies , 2015, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC).

[7]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Efficient mixed integer programming for autonomous overtaking , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[8]  D. Swaroop,et al.  A review of constant time headway policy for automatic vehicle following , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[9]  Andreas Kugi,et al.  Optimisation based path planning for car parking in narrow environments , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[10]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Risk functions oriented autonomous overtaking , 2017, 2017 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[11]  B. Mashadi,et al.  Global optimal path planning of an autonomous vehicle for overtaking a moving obstacle , 2014 .

[12]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic flow stability , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Harald Waschl,et al.  Flexible Spacing Adaptive Cruise Control Using Stochastic Model Predictive Control , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  Ionela Prodan,et al.  Hyperplane arrangements in mixed-integer programming techniques. Collision avoidance application with zonotopic sets , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[15]  Florent Altché,et al.  High-speed trajectory planning for autonomous vehicles using a simple dynamic model , 2017, 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[16]  Luigi del Re,et al.  Stochastic Prediction of Lane Change Trajectories for Adaptive Cruise Control , 2017 .