Sagittal plane motion in the human lumbar spine: comparison of the in vitro quasistatic neutral zone and dynamic motion parameters.

BACKGROUND Disabling low back pain is often attributed to clinical instability but defining instability is problematic. The most common parameter used to characterize instability in the lab is the neutral zone which is measured with a quasi-static technique. But, it cannot be measured from continuous motion data. Our goal was to describe the relationship between the quasi-static neutral zone and dynamic motion parameters that might reflect laxity about the neutral position. We also sought to determine if dynamic parameters were correlated with disc degeneration. METHODS Fifteen cadaveric lumbar motion segments were tested with both quasi-static and dynamic (continuous load) methods. Quasi-static range of motion and neutral zone were compared with dynamic range of motion, hysteresis loop width, and two parameters derived from the hysteresis data: transitional zone size and slope. Degeneration was graded macroscopically. FINDINGS Neutral zone size was moderately correlated with hysteresis loop width (r=0.69) and strongly correlated with the transitional zone slope (r=-0.80). Degenerative grade had a significant effect on dynamic range of motion and transitional zone size and slope with differences found between grade 1 (normal) discs and higher grades. Only transitional zone slope was different between grades 1 and 2. INTERPRETATION The transitional zone slope (representing the neutral region stiffness) had the strongest correlation with neutral zone and could best detect lower grades of degeneration. The transitional zone slope might be a useful parameter in dynamic studies investigating the association between degeneration and motion segment behavior.

[1]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Fixation Devices: I. A Conceptual Framework , 1988, Spine.

[2]  Michael A. Adams,et al.  'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs , 1996 .

[3]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Disc Degeneration Affects the Multidirectional Flexibility of the Lumbar Spine , 1994, Spine.

[4]  G A Dumas,et al.  A continuous pure moment loading apparatus for biomechanical testing of multi-segment spine specimens. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D S McNally,et al.  'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  P. O'Sullivan,et al.  Lumbar segmental 'instability': clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. , 2000, Manual therapy.

[7]  Rosemary E Thompson,et al.  Defining the Neutral Zone of sheep intervertebral joints during dynamic motions: an in vitro study. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  M. Panjabi.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[9]  P. Côté,et al.  The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: The Prevalence of Neck Pain and Related Disability in Saskatchewan Adults , 1998, Spine.

[10]  W C Hayes,et al.  Variation of lumbar spine stiffness with load. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Frymoyer Jw,et al.  An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. , 1991 .

[12]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Spinal Stability and Intersegmental Muscle Forces: A Biomechanical Model , 1989, Spine.

[13]  Matthew F Koff,et al.  Simulated extension osteotomy of the thumb metacarpal reduces carpometacarpal joint laxity in lateral pinch. , 2003, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  K. Markolf,et al.  Stiffness and laxity of the knee--the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Is It Possible to Simulate Physiologic Loading Conditions by Applying Pure Moments?: A Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Load Components in an Internal Fixator , 2001, Spine.

[16]  W C Hayes,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of the Clinical Stability of the Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine , 1982, Spine.

[17]  P. Côté,et al.  The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: The Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Related Disability in Saskatchewan Adults , 1998, Spine.

[18]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The onset and progression of spinal injury: a demonstration of neutral zone sensitivity. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  W. Hutton,et al.  Diurnal Variations in the Stresses on the Lumbar Spine , 1987, Spine.

[20]  B. Walker,et al.  Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability. , 2004, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.

[21]  T. Oxland,et al.  Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in vitro porcine investigation. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[23]  L. Claes,et al.  Spinal segment range of motion as a function of in vitro test conditions: Effects of exposure period, accumulated cycles, angular‐deformation rate, and moisture condition , 1998, The Anatomical record.

[24]  J. D. Peles,et al.  The spinal lax zone and neutral zone: measurement techniques and parameter comparisons. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.