On the Virtues of Assuming Minimal Differences in Information Processing in Individuals and Groups

The metaphor of groups as information processors has been gaining in popularity. If this metaphor’s utility is to be fully exploited, it is first necessary to distinguish - conceptually, theoretically, and empirically - when and how information processing in groups is any different from information processing in individuals. In this paper, several varieties or levels of group information processing are first conceptually distinguished. It is argued that differences between individual and group information processing which are manifest in differences between individual and group output are of greatest interest. However, it is further argued that such individual-group differences in output are not unfailing indicators of such interesting differences in processing. Two empirical illustrations are provided. It is further argued that (a) predictive models assuming little or no individual-group difference in information processing are particularly useful for detecting genuine instances of distinctive group information processing, and (b) that social combination models (such as Davis’ social decision scheme model, 1973) provide one particularly useful class of such models.

[1]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[2]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization in Simulated Juries , 1976 .

[3]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[4]  N. Kerr,et al.  The Psychology of the courtroom , 1981 .

[5]  M. E. Shaw.  A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[6]  E. F. Wright,et al.  Does group discussion facilitate the use of consensus information in making causal attributions , 1990 .

[7]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. , 1989 .

[8]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[9]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Model, method, and applications , 1982 .

[10]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  Reducing the effects of juror bias. , 1978 .

[11]  Keith E. Niedermeier,et al.  Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  N. Kerr,et al.  Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition , 1993 .

[14]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  N. Kerr,et al.  Defendant-juror similarity and mock joror judgments , 1995 .

[16]  Mike Robson,et al.  Problem-Solving in Groups , 1988 .

[17]  P. H. Lindsay,et al.  Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology , 1972 .

[18]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[19]  N. Kerr.  Effects of Prior Juror Experience on Juror Behavior , 1981 .

[20]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[21]  Herbert Solomon,et al.  Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems , 1955 .

[22]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Group position as a function of member attitudes. Choice shift effects from the perspective of social decision scheme theory. , 1975 .

[23]  N. Kerr,et al.  Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research , 2015 .

[24]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[25]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. , 1981 .

[26]  N. Kerr,et al.  The social psychology of jury deliberations: Structure, process, and product. , 1981 .

[27]  N. Kerr,et al.  Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias , 1990 .

[28]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. , 1987 .

[29]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[30]  F RESTLE,et al.  The analysis of problems and prediction of group problem solving. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.