Fluorescent nanoparticle-based Internet of things.

A prototypal molecular Internet of things (IoT) network is reported. Starting from the design of the communication architecture, we have theoretically simulated molecular messenger information exchange by means of fluid-based advection. The objective was to determine the key experimental parameters affecting information storage and transfer efficiency. The first working molecular-IoT prototype, based on a chemical communication network, was then developed. Its selectivity was ensured by employing as many different chemical messengers as networked devices; thus three different carbon nanoparticles, characterized by different fluorescence wavelengths, were employed to ensure an effective communication between three networked actuators.

[1]  R. Martínez‐Máñez,et al.  Toward chemical communication between nanodevices , 2017 .

[2]  Félix Sancenón,et al.  Interactive models of communication at the nanoscale using nanoparticles that talk to one another , 2017, Nature Communications.

[3]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  The internet of Bio-Nano things , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Bai Yang,et al.  Common origin of green luminescence in carbon nanodots and graphene quantum dots. , 2014, ACS nano.

[5]  Rajib Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Carbon quantum dots from natural resource: A review , 2018, Materials Today Chemistry.

[6]  Shaoqian Li,et al.  6G Wireless Communications: Vision and Potential Techniques , 2019, IEEE Network.

[7]  R. Ruffino,et al.  Reactive nanomessengers for artificial chemical communication. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[8]  Bai Yang,et al.  The photoluminescence mechanism in carbon dots (graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots, and polymer dots): current state and future perspective , 2015, Nano Research.

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  The Internet of nano-things , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  Tabletop Molecular Communication: Text Messages through Chemical Signals , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Andrew W. Eckford,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Advancements in Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Kyriaki Manoli,et al.  Organic field-effect transistor sensors: a tutorial review. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[13]  G. Taylor.  Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  M. Schoenfisch,et al.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Stamatios Giannoukos,et al.  A Chemical Alphabet for Macromolecular Communications. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Applications of molecular communications to medicine: A survey , 2016, Nano Commun. Networks.

[17]  Vahid Jamali,et al.  Biological Optical-to-Chemical Signal Conversion Interface: A Small-Scale Modulator for Molecular Communications. , 2019, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[18]  B. J. Venton,et al.  Review: Carbon nanotube based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules. , 2010, Analytica chimica acta.

[19]  Luca Fichera,et al.  Self-assembled carbon nanoparticles as messengers for artificial chemical communication. , 2019, Nanoscale.

[20]  T. Gunnlaugsson,et al.  Fluorescent chemosensors: the past, present and future. , 2017, Chemical Society reviews.

[21]  G. Li-Destri,et al.  Fluorescent Quantum Dots Make Feasible Long-Range Transmission of Molecular Bits. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[22]  Mauro Femminella,et al.  Simulation of molecular signaling in blood vessels: Software design and application to atherogenesis , 2013, Nano Commun. Networks.

[23]  Robert Schober,et al.  Magnetic Nanoparticle Based Interface for Molecular Communication Systems , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[24]  Olga Galinina,et al.  Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary M2M radio technology roadmap , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.