The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information

Research has widely explored the differences between conservatives and liberals, and it has been also recently demonstrated that conservatives display different reactions toward valenced stimuli. However, previous studies have not yet fully illuminated the cognitive underpinnings of these differences. In the current work, we argued that political ideology is related to selective attention processes, so that negative stimuli are more likely to automatically grab the attention of conservatives as compared to liberals. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that negative (vs. positive) information impaired the performance of conservatives, more than liberals, in an Emotional Stroop Task. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2 and in Experiment 3 employing a Dot-Probe Task, demonstrating that threatening stimuli were more likely to attract the attention of conservatives. Overall, results support the conclusion that people embracing conservative views of the world display an automatic selective attention for negative stimuli.

[1]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Are Needs to Manage Uncertainty and Threat Associated With Political Conservatism or Ideological Extremity? , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  H. Michael Crowson,et al.  Are All Conservatives Alike? A Study of the Psychological Correlates of Cultural and Economic Conservatism , 2009, The Journal of psychology.

[3]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  The Other “Authoritarian Personality” , 1998 .

[4]  John T. Jost,et al.  Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals? , 2008, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. Matthews,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of the Model of Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition , 2009 .

[7]  Jaime L. Napier,et al.  Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  J. Jost The end of the end of ideology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[9]  Sarah L. Master,et al.  Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Mahmutčehajić On the Other , 2011 .

[11]  J. Vigil Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning , 2010 .

[12]  Kevin B. Smith,et al.  Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits , 2008, Science.

[13]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation , 2011 .

[14]  J. Duckitt,et al.  The Impact of Social Threat on Worldview and Ideological Attitudes , 2003 .

[15]  P. Lang International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[16]  A. Roets,et al.  Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale , 2011 .

[17]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  C. MacLeod,et al.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders. , 1986, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[20]  T. Adorno The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[21]  Joseph B. Tamney,et al.  Social Traditionalism and Economic Conservatism: Two Conservative Political Ideologies in the United States , 2001, The Journal of social psychology.

[22]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[23]  Nicholas O. Rule,et al.  Democrats and Republicans Can Be Differentiated from Their Faces , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  G. Caprara,et al.  Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[25]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation , 2009 .

[26]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  R. Janoff-Bulman,et al.  Mapping moral motives : Approach, avoidance, and political orientation , 2008 .

[28]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[29]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults , 2011, Current Biology.

[30]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[31]  G. Wilson,et al.  Conservatism and art preferences. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Janoff-Bulman To Provide or Protect: Motivational Bases of Political Liberalism and Conservatism , 2009 .

[33]  S. Gosling,et al.  The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind , 2008 .

[34]  A. Baird,et al.  Attending to Threat: Race-based Patterns of Selective Attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[35]  R. Adolphs,et al.  The human amygdala in social judgment , 1998, Nature.