Acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa graft for cervicovaginal reconstruction in eight patients with malformation of the uterine cervix.

STUDY QUESTION Can surgical reconstruction of the cervix and vagina in patients be achieved using an acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft? SUMMARY ANSWER Our experiences of combined laparoscopic and vaginal cervicovaginal reconstruction using an SIS graft in eight patients were positive, with successful reconstruction and no complications, cervical stenosis or vaginal stenosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In patients with agenesis and dysgenesis of the uterine cervix and vagina, surgical reconstruction of the internal genitalia is a challenging problem for gynecologists. Hysterectomy with the creation of an artificial vagina was the treatment of choice in the 1990s. Recently, conservative management has been gradually adopted to avoid extirpation of the uterus, including the canalization techniques, the uterovaginal anastomosis and the reconstruction of cervical and vaginal agenesis with some autologous tissues. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective observational study from January 2012 to March 2013 included 8 patients aged 10-18 years with malformation of the cervix (1 with cervical agenesis, 1 with a cervical body consisting of a fibrous band and 6 with obstruction of the cervical os) and vagina (4 with complete vaginal aplasia and 4 with a 1-3 cm long vaginal pouch) diagnosed by physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Eight patients underwent combined laparoscopic and vaginal cervicovaginal reconstruction using an SIS graft during the end of menstruation. A T-shaped intrauterine device connected with a 14-French Foley catheter was inserted into the uterine cavity to keep the newly created cervix patent, and then a permanent lower uterine cerclage was placed. Patients were assessed post-operatively at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 15 months, and data on menstruation and the morphology of the neovagina and cervix were recorded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The mean ± SD age of the patients was 14.5 ± 2.8 (10-18) years. All patients had a history of cyclic abdominal pain, and the average delay in diagnosis was 4.5 ± 4.0 (0-12) months. One patient had a previous history of unsuccessful attempt at canalization and two post-operative hematometra drainages before referral. The mean operating time was 201 ± 67 (120-330) min, with a mean estimated blood loss of 157 ± 154 (30-500) ml. The first case was converted to laparotomy, and the others were successfully completed. None of the patients had a complication or required blood transfusion. All the patients showed resumption of menstruation. The patients were followed for 8 ± 4 (4-15) months, and no cervical or vaginal stenosis occurred in any of the cases. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The sample size of this study was small. A larger study that compared this method with previous techniques regarding the complication and success rates would increase the value of the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS A combined laparoscopic and vaginal cervicovaginal reconstruction with an SIS graft is a potential alternative to the management of congenital agenesis and dysgenesis of uterine cervix and vagina. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The work was supported by National Key Clinical Faculty Construction Program of China. No competing interests are declared.

[1]  H. Konar,et al.  Pregnancies after reconstructive surgery for congenital cervicovaginal atresia. , 2000, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  A. Gürlek,et al.  Combined cervical and vaginal reconstruction with prefabricated pudendal thigh flap in a case with cervical and vaginal agenesis (MURCS syndrome): a new and original technique. , 2008, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  Klod Kokini,et al.  Morphologic study of small intestinal submucosa as a body wall repair device. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  L A Geddes,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa as a small-diameter arterial graft in the dog. , 1990, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[5]  A. Kriplani,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis in congenital atresia of uterine cervix: follow-up study. , 2012, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[6]  N. Klein,et al.  Congenital cervical atresia: report of seven cases and review of the literature. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Christian Cd,et al.  Functional endometrial tissue with vaginal agenesis. , 1978 .

[8]  E. Rodriguez,et al.  Revascularization of Human Acellular Dermis in Full-Thickness Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in the Rabbit Model , 2003, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  Chin-Jung Wang,et al.  Free microvascular transfer of the vermiform appendix and colon for creation of a uterovaginal fistula: a new technique for cervicovaginal reconstruction. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  J. Patton,et al.  Use of human acellular dermal matrix in complex and contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[11]  M. Rosen,et al.  Small intestinal submucosa as a bioscaffold for biliary tract regeneration. , 2002, Surgery.

[12]  M. Bazot,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis for uterine cervix atresia with partial vaginal aplasia. , 2009, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[13]  M. Chancellor,et al.  Advances toward tissue engineering for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. , 2004, Reviews in urology.

[14]  Yu‐Shih Yang,et al.  Successful pregnancy in a gonadectomized woman with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis and gonadoblastoma. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  L. Fedele,et al.  Laparoscopically assisted uterovestibular anastomosis in patients with uterine cervix atresia and vaginal aplasia. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  J. Rock,et al.  The Clinical Management of Maldevelopment of the Uterine Cervix , 1995 .

[17]  S. Badylak,et al.  Histology after dural grafting with small intestinal submucosa. , 1996, Surgical neurology.

[18]  S. Badylak,et al.  Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model. , 2001, The Journal of surgical research.

[19]  E. Vizza,et al.  Vaginal reconstruction by skin grafts: a scanning electron microscopic evaluation. , 1992, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[20]  R. Jewelewicz,et al.  Congenital atresia of the uterine cervix and vagina: three cases. , 1980, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  S. Hanquinet,et al.  Uterocervicoplasty with a bladder mucosa layer for the treatment of complete cervical agenesis. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  S. Badylak,et al.  Small bowel tissue engineering using small intestinal submucosa as a scaffold. , 2001, The Journal of surgical research.

[23]  R C Harruff,et al.  Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a bladder wall substitute. , 1995, Urology.

[24]  Y. Soong,et al.  Laparoscopically assisted full thickness skin graft for reconstruction in congenital agenesis of vagina and uterine cervix. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[25]  B. Haddad,et al.  Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[26]  A. M. Altizer,et al.  Are Biologic Grafts Effective for Hernia Repair? , 2009, Surgical innovation.

[27]  B. Halıloglu,et al.  Abdominal surgical approach to a case of complete cervical and partial vaginal agenesis. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[28]  F. Ayubi,et al.  Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol® and Surgisis® grafts in a rat hernia model , 2008, Hernia.

[29]  G. Lantz,et al.  Morphologic study of three collagen materials for body wall repair. , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[30]  J. Kreeger,et al.  The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a biomaterial for perineal herniorrhaphy in the dog. , 2002, Veterinary surgery : VS.