Comparing narratives of personal and preferred partner characteristics in online dating advertisements

This study explored online personal ads of 294 heterosexual and homosexual men and women in the United States through a qualitative analysis and comparison of participant-generated ''personal'' and ''preferred partner'' narratives. Nine characteristics were identified and combined into three overarching categories: physical, lifestyle, and personality characteristics. These three personal and preferred partner characteristics were examined for difference by gender, sexual orientation, age and desired relationship type of the advertisers. Main effects emerged for all four predictors, most notably for age and desired relationship type. Additionally, this study explored the possibility that personal and preferred partner narratives contained similar constellations of characteristics, finding significant correlations on all three variables, lending support for the matching hypothesis in dating partner characteristics.

[1]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[2]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Perceived Success in Internet Dating Self-Presentation in Online Personals: The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and , 2009 .

[3]  J. Coupland.  Past the ‘perfect kind of age’? Styling selves and relationships in over-50s dating advertisements , 2000 .

[4]  D. Watson,et al.  Match makers and deal breakers: analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[5]  Successful Personal Ads: Gender Differences and Similarities in Offers, Stipulations, and Outcomes , 1991 .

[6]  Michael Hardey.  Mediated Relationships , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel W. Baack,et al.  Downloading Love: A Content Analysis of Internet Personal Advertisements Placed by College Students , 1999 .

[8]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[9]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[10]  E. Jagger.  Marketing Molly and Melville: Dating in a Postmodern, Consumer Society , 2001 .

[11]  Monica T. Whitty,et al.  Revealing the 'real' me, searching for the 'actual' you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  B. Buunk,et al.  Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels , 2002 .

[13]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Adam Arvidsson,et al.  ‘Quality singles’: internet dating and the work of fantasy , 2006, New Media Soc..

[15]  Stephanie L. Brown,et al.  Age preferences and mate choice among homosexuals and heterosexuals: A case for modular psychological mechanisms. , 1995 .

[16]  M. Hatala,et al.  Content Analysis of Gay Male and Lesbian Personal Advertisements , 1996, Psychological reports.

[17]  Ladd Wheeler,et al.  Self-Presentation in Personal Advertisements: The Influence of Implicit Notions of Attraction and Role Expectations , 1988 .

[18]  Personal advertisements of male-to-female transsexuals, homosexual men, and heterosexuals , 1996 .

[19]  J. Coupland,et al.  Articulations of Same‐sex Desire: Lesbian and Gay Male Dating Advertisements , 1998 .

[20]  Rosemary Bolig,et al.  The Self-Advertisement Approach to Dating: Male-Female Differences. , 1984 .

[21]  T. Darin Matthews.  A World Wide Web-Based Research Project , 1999 .

[22]  E. Jagger.  Is Thirty the New Sixty? Dating, Age and Gender in a Postmodern, Consumer Society , 2005 .

[23]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Self-Presentation in Online Personals , 2006, Commun. Res..

[24]  Sarah A. Meyers,et al.  "Your Mother Would Like Me": Self-Presentation in the Personals Ads of Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women , 1993 .

[25]  Michael R. Cunningham,et al.  Lying to Get a Date: The Effect of Facial Physical Attractiveness on the Willingness to Deceive Prospective Dating Partners , 1999 .

[26]  J. Smith,et al.  The “Skinny” on Body Size Requests in Personal Ads , 2000 .

[27]  Christine Smith,et al.  What Do Women Want? The Effects of Gender and Sexual Orientation on the Desirability of Physical Attributes in the Personal Ads of Women , 2002 .

[28]  A. Harrison,et al.  Let's make a deal: An analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. , 1977 .