Triple-porosity analysis of solute transport

Abstract As an extension to the traditional dual-porosity approach, a triple-porosity model is presented to study the solute transport in heterogeneous porous media where the transport processes are distinctly different between macropores, mesopores and micropores. The distinctions in terms of conductance and storage in the respective pore domain are characterized by the fact that: (a) macropores are primary flow paths where both dispersion and convection are prevalent; (b) mesopores are intermediate flow paths where convection becomes dominant and (c) micropores are supplemental flow paths and mass storage spaces where only diffusive flow is manifested. In cascading coupling, the solute interchange between micropores and mesopores is maintained by assuming micropore diffusion as internal sources (sinks) attached to mesopore skins. A comprehensive solute exchange between macropores and mesopores is preserved. A mathematical model is constructed in accordance with the physical conceptualization. The coupled partial differential equations are solved in a one-dimensional geometry using Laplace transform, and the subsequent coupled ordinary differential equations are circumvented via the method of differential operators. Semi-analytical solutions are obtained.

[1]  R. H. Nilson,et al.  Double‐porosity modelling of oscillatory gas motion and contaminant transport in a fractured porous medium , 1990 .

[2]  H. C. Noltimier.  A model for grain dispersion and magnetic anisotropy in sedimentary rocks , 1971 .

[3]  Jean Piquemal,et al.  On the modelling of miscible displacements in porous media with stagnant fluid , 1992 .

[4]  James E. Houseworth.  Characterizing Permeability Heterogeneity in Core Samples From Standard Miscible Displacement Experiments , 1993 .

[5]  P. Jardine,et al.  A multiple-pore-region concept to modeling mass transfer in subsurface media , 1995 .

[6]  R. J. Luxmoore,et al.  Estimating Macroporosity in a Forest Watershed by use of a Tension Infiltrometer1 , 1986 .

[7]  M. Sahimi.  Flow phenomena in rocks : from continuum models to fractals, percolation, cellular automata, and simulated annealing , 1993 .

[8]  Chin Jian Leo,et al.  Boundary element analysis of contaminant transport in fractured porous media , 1993 .

[9]  K. H. Coats,et al.  Dead-End Pore Volume and Dispersion in Porous Media , 1964 .

[10]  Nicholas Kouwen,et al.  Stochastic Model of Particulate Transport in Porous Medium , 1993 .

[11]  Muhammad Sahimi,et al.  Computer simulation of particle transport processes in flow through porous media , 1991 .

[12]  E. A. Sudicky,et al.  The Laplace Transform Galerkin Technique for large-scale simulation of mass transport in discretely fractured porous formations , 1992 .

[13]  Glenn V. Wilson,et al.  Physical and chemical controls of preferred path flow through a forested hillslope , 1990 .

[14]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Numerical analysis of solute migration through fractured clayey deposits into underlying aquifers , 1992 .

[15]  Jean Piquemal.  On the modelling conditions of mass transfer in porous media presenting capacitance effects by a dispersion-convection equation for the mobile fluid and a diffusion equation for the stagnant fluid , 1993 .

[16]  D. Elsworth,et al.  Multiporosity/multipermeability approach to the simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs , 1993 .

[17]  Nicholas Kouwen,et al.  Particulate transport in a porous media under non-linear flow conditions , 1991 .

[18]  M. Bai,et al.  Modeling of Heat Flow And Solute Transport In Fractured Rock Masses , 1995 .

[19]  James G. Berryman,et al.  The elastic coefficients of double‐porosity models for fluid transport in jointed rock , 1995 .

[20]  J. Bear,et al.  1 – Modeling Flow and Contaminant Transport in Fractured Rocks , 1993 .

[21]  Ivars Neretnieks,et al.  2 – Solute Transport in Fractured Rock — Applications to Radionuclide Waste Repositories , 1993 .

[22]  David E. Daniel,et al.  Geotechnical practice for waste disposal , 1993 .

[23]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  On the modeling of miscible flow in multi-component porous media , 1995 .

[24]  M. Bai,et al.  Experimental and numerical simulation of solute transport in heterogeneous porous media , 1996 .

[25]  J. Passioura,et al.  HYDRODYNAMIC DISPERSION IN AGGREGATED MEDIA: 2. EFFECTS OF VELOCITY AND AGGREGATE SIZE , 1971 .

[26]  John R Booker,et al.  Contaminant migration in a regular two- or three-dimensional fractured network: Reactive contaminants , 1990 .

[27]  Jean-Claude Roegiers,et al.  On the correlation of nonlinear flow and linear transport with application to dual-porosity modeling , 1994 .

[28]  Robert Bibby,et al.  Mass transport of solutes in dual‐porosity media , 1981 .

[29]  Chin-Fu Tsang,et al.  Flow and Contaminant Transport in Fractured Rock , 1993 .

[30]  Allen F. Moench,et al.  Double‐Porosity Models for a Fissured Groundwater Reservoir With Fracture Skin , 1984 .

[31]  E. A. Sudicky,et al.  Contaminant transport in fractured porous media: Analytical solution for a single fracture , 1981 .

[32]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  Modeling the Nonequilibrium Transport of Linearly Interacting Solutes in Porous Media: A Review , 1991 .

[33]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[34]  M. A. Koenders,et al.  Flow equations of particle fluid mixtures , 1992 .

[35]  J. E. Warren,et al.  The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1963 .

[36]  Charles R. Faust,et al.  Finite element techniques for modeling groundwater flow in fractured aquifers , 1983 .