Work Activities as a Resource for Work Organization Design and for Strategic Decisions?

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Considering workers' activity as a potential resource for strategic decisions is the main idea proposed in this article. Diverse research in the field of ergonomics supports the importance of knowing what people actually do at work in order to fulfill production goals, especially considering that there is always a gap between what was proposed and considered in task design and the real situation. For this purpose, approaching work situations through an ergonomic work analysis makes it possible to obtain evidence of the worker's activities and to propose, based on a participative approach, improvements in working situations to improve production, safety, and health. This knowledge should be considered as a source for strategic decisions to improve reliability, productivity, and quality, as well as to afford conditions for improving health and safety.

[1]  N. Vézina,et al.  L'intervention en ergonomie , 2011 .

[2]  F. Hubault Le travail de management , 2013 .

[3]  Kazutaka Kogi,et al.  Participatory methods effective for ergonomic workplace improvement. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  François Daniellou,et al.  The French-speaking ergonomists' approach to work activity: cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models , 2005 .

[5]  Andrew S. Imada,et al.  The Value of Participation in Ergonomics , 2007 .

[6]  R. N. Pikaar Eur New Challenges: Ergonomics in Engineering Projects , 2007 .

[7]  Humberto Maturana Romesín,et al.  DE MAQUINAS Y SERES VIVOS, AUTOPOIESIS: la organización de lo vivo "Quinta edición" , 1998 .

[8]  P. Falzon,et al.  Pour une ergonomie constructive , 2013 .

[9]  Flore Barcellini,et al.  The development of collective activity , 2014 .

[10]  C. Dejours L'évaluation du travail à l'épreuve du réel , 2003 .

[11]  B. Maggi De l’agir organisationnel. Un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l’apprentissage , 2016 .

[12]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  Laerte Idal Sznelwar Ergonomics and Work – Different Approaches and Challenges for the Future , 2007 .

[14]  C. D. Tertre Économie servicielle et travail : contribution théorique au développement « d'une économie de la coopération » , 2013 .

[15]  E.A.P. Koningsveld 1 – Meeting Diversity in Ergonomics , 2007 .

[16]  S. Caroly,et al.  Le développement de l’activité collective , 2013 .

[17]  P. Vink,et al.  Positive outcomes of participatory ergonomics in terms of greater comfort and higher productivity. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  W. Patrick Neumann,et al.  The Strategic Business Value of Ergonomics**Parts of this chapter have been previously published in Dul and Neumann [38] and Neumann and Dul [24]. , 2007 .

[19]  Pascal Béguin,et al.  Taking activity into account during the design process , 2007 .

[20]  François Daniellou,et al.  Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design , 2007 .

[21]  Michiel de Looze,et al.  Meeting diversity in ergonomics. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  E. Morin,et al.  L' intelligence de la complexité , 1999 .

[23]  Kenneth R Boff,et al.  Revolutions and shifting paradigms in human factors & ergonomics. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.