Effects of Context on a Visual 3-D Pointing Task

We examined the effects of egocentric and contextual references on a 3-D exocentric pointing task. Large systematic deviations were found for the slant (angle in the horizontal plane). For most observers, the deviations were smaller when the veridical pointing direction was parallel to a wall. For some observers the size of the deviations was also dependent on whether the veridical pointing direction was frontoparallel or not. For the tilt (angle in the vertical plane), the deviations were smaller and less systematic. Hence, although observers show comparable systematic deviations, the way in which the presence of structure in an environment is used for judging positions of objects is observer-dependent.

[1]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Visual space under free viewing conditions , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Scale invariance in near space: pointing under influence of context. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[3]  D. Levi,et al.  Meridional Anisotropy in the Discrimination of Parallel and Perpendicular Lines—Effect of Body Tilt , 1996, Perception.

[4]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Investigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  A. A. Blank.  Curvature of Binocular Visual Space. An Experiment , 1961 .

[6]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On the role of external reference frames on visual judgements of parallelity. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[8]  A. Zajaczkowska.  Experimental Determination of Luneburg's Constants σ and κ , 1956 .

[9]  Herschel W. Leibowitz,et al.  Oculomotor adjustments in darkness and the specific distance tendency , 1976 .

[10]  W. Gogel,et al.  EQUIDISTANCE TENDENCY AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large Systematic Deviations in Visual Parallelism , 2000, Perception.

[12]  Michelle J A Doumen,et al.  Horizontal-vertical anisotropy in visual space. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Dale Purves,et al.  A statistical explanation of visual space , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large-Scale Visual Frontoparallels under Full-Cue Conditions , 2002, Perception.

[15]  W. Gehringer,et al.  Effect of ecological viewing conditions on the Ames' distorted room illusion. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  W. Darling,et al.  The Visual Perception Coordinate System Uses Axes Defined by the Earth, Trunk, and Vision , 2005, Perception.

[17]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[18]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Curvature of Visual Space , 2000, Perception.

[19]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .