Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin's Vase–Face Illusion

We localized regions in the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus that were more active when subjects viewed photographs of real faces than when they viewed complex inanimate objects and other areas in the parahippocampal gyrus and the lateral occipital lobe that showed more activity during the presentation of nonface objects. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging was then used to monitor activity in these extrastriate visual areas while subjects viewed Rubin's vase-face stimulus and indicated switches in perception. Since the spontaneous shifts in interpretation were too rapid for direct correlation with hemodynamic responses, each reported percept (faces or vase) was prolonged by suddenly adding subtle local contrast gradients (embossing) to one side or the other of the figure-ground boundary, stabilizing the percept. Under these conditions, only face-selective areas in the fusiform gyrus responded more strongly during the perception of faces. To control for effects of the physical change to Rubin's stimulus (i.e., addition of embossing), we compared activity when the face contours were embossed after the subject had just reported the onset of perception of either faces or vase. Activity in the fusiform face area responded more strongly under the first condition, despite the fact that the physical stimulus sequences were identical. Moreover, on a trial-to-trial basis, the activity was statistically predictive of the subjects' responses, suggesting that the conscious perception of faces could be made explicit in this extrastriate visual area.

[1]  K. H. Britten,et al.  A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[3]  L. A. N. Esq.,et al.  LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid , 1832 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[8]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[11]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[12]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  The role responses of expression and identity in the face-selective of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989 .

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Parker,et al.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[19]  D. Purves,et al.  Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Perception of facial characteristics by monkeys. , 1990 .

[22]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of temporal autocorrelation in FMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  A. Parker,et al.  Perceptually Bistable Three-Dimensional Figures Evoke High Choice Probabilities in Cortical Area MT , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[27]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[28]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[29]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Interocular control of neuronal responsiveness in cat visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[31]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[32]  D. Purves,et al.  The perception of transparent three-dimensional objects. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Keiji Tanaka Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Robust automated brain extraction , 2000, NeuroImage.

[36]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. , 1997, Science.

[39]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[41]  H D Crane,et al.  Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. , 1985, Applied optics.

[42]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[44]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[45]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[46]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[48]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[50]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[54]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[55]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[56]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  O. Witte,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Brain , 2000 .