Design for reusability of medical equipment for optimal modularization using an endoscope as case study

Abstract The reprocessing of reusable medical equipment (RME) is complex due to the difficulty of eliminating infections. Healthcare providers have expressed dissatisfaction with the difficulty faced in cleaning and disinfecting medical equipment after use. Reprocessed RMEs include endoscopes, valves, adapters etc. This research aims to increase the ease of reprocessing and decrease the risk of infection using a collaborative modular architecture framework. The methodology is divided into four steps. First, we identify and define the product’s functional and physical decompositions. Secondly, based on stakeholders’ input, parameters such as design, human factors, and cost were identified to be the main factors affecting the reprocessing of an endoscope. The parameters’ subsequent metrics are selected for performance requirements. Thirdly, surveys are developed to collect data about the performance of different endoscope models. Fourthly, we utilize a linear multi-objective optimization model which aims at generating representative solutions on the true Pareto front of the problem that maximizes the similarity among module members in terms of the factors. Finally, we combine the module information with efficiency feedback to derive recommendations for the users. A case study is presented using hospital data. The results indicate that there is a high risk of infection caused by human errors during reprocessing for endoscopes clustered in Module 1 compared to Module 2 and 3. To ensure that the safety and quality of medical care rendered to patients are not compromised, we recommend that healthcare providers utilize endoscopes in Modules 2 and 3 as they are safe and easy to reprocess.

[1]  Lawrence F Muscarella,et al.  Transmission of Infection during Gastrointestinal Endoscopy , 2013 .

[2]  Bipan Chand,et al.  Automated endoscope reprocessors. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[3]  James Collins,et al.  Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2016 update. , 2017, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[4]  Cori L Ofstead,et al.  Endoscope Reprocessing Methods: A Prospective Study on the Impact of Human Factors and Automation , 2010, Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates.

[5]  Francisco Ruiz,et al.  A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  Joseph Romagnuolo,et al.  Multisociety Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible GI Endoscopes: 2011 , 2011, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Patient safety and reprocessing: A usability test of the endoscope reprocessing procedure , 2016 .

[8]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Approximation Algorithms , 2001, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  Lawrence F Muscarella,et al.  Inconsistencies in Endoscope-Reprocessing and Infection-Control Guidelines: The Importance of Endoscope Drying , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[10]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Design for manufacture and design for `X`: concepts, applications, and perspectives , 2001 .

[11]  Top 10 health technology hazards for 2014. , 2013, Health devices.

[12]  Marek Makowski,et al.  Model-Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications , 2000 .

[13]  A. Messac,et al.  Smart Pareto filter: obtaining a minimal representation of multiobjective design space , 2004 .

[14]  E. Seoane-Vazquez,et al.  Endoscopy-related infections and toxic reactions: an international comparison , 2007, Endoscopy.

[15]  T. B. Garland,et al.  An Expert Perspective of Errors in Endoscope Reprocessing , 2011 .

[16]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  A discussion of scalarization techniques for multiple objective integer programming , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  W. Rutala,et al.  New disinfection and sterilization methods. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[18]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Hybrid Integrated Multi-Objective Optimization Procedure for Estimating Nadir Point , 2009, EMO.

[19]  N. Suh Designing-in of Quality Through Axiomatic Design , 2004 .

[20]  Richard A. Pierce,et al.  Use of flexible endoscopes for NOTES: sterilization or high-level disinfection? , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  William A Rutala,et al.  Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization of Prion-Contaminated Medical Instruments , 2010, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[22]  Cynthia Shum,et al.  Comparative cost-efficiency of the EVOTECH endoscope cleaner and reprocessor versus manual cleaning plus automated endoscope reprocessing in a real-world Canadian hospital endoscopy setting , 2011, BMC gastroenterology.

[23]  Jennifer Werfel,et al.  Model Based Decision Support Methodology With Environmental Applications , 2016 .

[24]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming , 1983, Math. Program..

[25]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Exploring Human Factors in Endoscope Reprocessing , 2010 .

[26]  Y. J. Lu,et al.  Applying mass customization to the production of industrial steam turbines , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[27]  Enrique Seoane-Vazquez,et al.  Endoscopy-related infection: relic of the past? , 2008, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[28]  Melih Özlen,et al.  Multi-objective integer programming: A general approach for generating all non-dominated solutions , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Leslie Monplaisir,et al.  Integrated fuzzy-based modular architecture for medical device design and development , 2010 .

[30]  Carol Petersen,et al.  Multi-society guideline for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes , 2003, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[31]  W A Rutala,et al.  Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective. , 2004, The Journal of hospital infection.

[32]  Peter K Lindenauer,et al.  A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States. , 2013, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[33]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .