Mammography grid performance.

PURPOSE To measure directly the grid performance of mammography units for the range of breast thicknesses and x-ray tube potentials encountered in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Contrast improvement factors and Bucky factors were determined for four mammographic units as a function of x-ray tube potential (25, 30, and 35 kVp), phantom thickness (2, 4, and 8 cm) and, on one unit, three target-filter combinations. Three units used a linear grid; one, a cellular grid. Two methods were used for nongrid measurements. RESULTS For all units tested, contrast improvement factor increased with increased phantom thickness and with increased kilovolt peak level for the 8-cm-thick phantom and changed little with kilovolt peak level for 2- and 4-cm-thick phantoms. At 25 and 30 kVp, contrast improvement factor performance with the linear grids was comparable; with the cellular grid, it was 5%-10% higher. In all cases, the Bucky factor increased with increased phantom thickness and decreased with increased tube potential. CONCLUSION Differences in grid performance exist. At 25 and 30 kVp, the cellular grid exhibited superior contrast improvement factor performance, whereas one of the linear grids exhibited superior Bucky factor performance. Measured contrast improvement and Bucky factors are dependent on nongrid technique. Cassette tunnels introduce scatter and should not be used with nongrid or magnification techniques.

[1]  D R Dance,et al.  The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R A Geise,et al.  Improved mammography with a reduced radiation dose. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  I A Brezovich,et al.  The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography. , 1978, Radiology.

[4]  P Sprawls,et al.  Grids in mammography. , 1983, Radiology.

[5]  G. Fagerberg,et al.  Image Quality in Mammography with Special Reference to Anti-Scatter Grids and the Magnification Technique , 1986, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[6]  G T Barnes,et al.  Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  D R Dance,et al.  Calculation of dose and contrast for two mammographic grids. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Y Higashida,et al.  Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography. , 1985, Radiology.

[10]  D D Dershaw,et al.  Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid. , 1985, Radiology.

[11]  C J Vyborny,et al.  Physical and clinical evaluation of new high-strip-density radiographic grids. , 1983, Radiology.

[12]  E A Sickles,et al.  High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Friedrich,et al.  Der Einfluß der Streustrahlung auf die Abbildungsqualität bei der Mammographie , 1975 .