Multimodal approach to automobile driving comfort: The influence of visual setting on assessments of vibro-acoustic comfort in simulators

Abstract The growing use of vehicles in urban areas means that comfort in low-speed driving phase is an increasingly important consideration for manufacturers. Examining comfort in such situation requires not only field experiments but also the use of simulators to control the characteristics of the stimuli to which participants are exposed. Incorporating a visual scene with vibration and sound stimuli is one possible way of improving simulation conditions. Two experiments were conducted to measure the influence of the immersion relating to vibratory, sound and visual modes on comfort assessments. In the first experiment, participants were exposed to different combinations of vibration, noise and road videos (8 vehicles, 2 roads). The visual mode only led to a small bearing on ratings. Regardless of the mode presented, the level of vibration emerged as the crucial factor in assessing overall comfort. Little interactions between sound and vibration modes were also highlighted. The second experiment dealt with context given by the visual mode. Acoustic and vibration stimuli were combined with very different road videos, which modified participants’ expectations with regard to the situation. Results demonstrated that combining different visual settings with vibro-acoustic stimuli, no matter how much they were opposed, only exerted a small influence on participants’ comfort. In the end, with regard both to immersion and contextualisation, the effects of the visual mode are so low-scale as to be insignificant. Accordingly, they may be ignored in future similar experiments, which can make the experimental set-up easier.

[1]  Etienne Parizet,et al.  Influence of noise and vibration to comfort in diesel engine cars running at idle , 2004 .

[2]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Influences of color on the loudness judgement , 2002 .

[3]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Influence of vehicle color on loudness judgments. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J D Leatherwood,et al.  Development of noise and vibration ride comfort criteria. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Crosscultural Effects in Audio-Visual Interactions , 2004 .

[6]  J. Kastka,et al.  Effects of combined noise and vibration on annoyance , 1995 .

[7]  M J Griffin,et al.  The relative importance of noise and vibration from railways. , 1990, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Henrik Møller Fundamentals of binaural technology , 1991 .

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Subjective response to combined noise and vibration: summation and interaction effects , 1990 .

[10]  Takashi Yano,et al.  STANDARDIZED GENERAL-PURPOSE NOISE REACTION QUESTIONS FOR COMMUNITY NOISE SURVEYS: RESEARCH AND A RECOMMENDATION , 2001 .

[11]  C. Lavandier,et al.  Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment , 2002 .

[12]  Klaus Genuit,et al.  The influence of combined environmental stimuli on the evaluation of acoustical comfort: case studies carried out in an interactive simulation environment , 2007 .

[13]  Jack D. Leatherwood,et al.  The development of interior noise and vibration criteria , 1990 .

[14]  E. Parizet,et al.  Influence of Train Colour on Loudness Judgments , 2011 .

[15]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Discrepancy and nondiscrepancy methods of assessing visual-auditory interaction , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.