Pierre Bourdieu and transformative agency: a study of how patients in Benin negotiate blame and accountability in the context of severe obstetric events.

This paper explores the social and institutional processes that constrain and enable obstetric patients in Benin to critically evaluate quality of healthcare and to stimulate positive changes in the health system. Based on qualitative data collected as part of a hospital auditing system, the paper analyses semi-structured patient feedback interviews and their function as a primary mechanism through which critical patient evaluation can develop constructively. Using a Bourdieuan framework, we explore the dynamic social conditions that give rise to transformative agency and institutional change. Our results show that hospitals are often permeated with the habitus of employment, kinship and reproductive social fields, through which a number of social, economic and healthcare conflicts, power struggles and blame-inducing interactions emerge. These conflicts generally serve to keep patients quiescent and passive when it comes to developing critical statements of quality of care. In a subset of cases, however, these conflicts are transformed by patients and their family members into opportunities for modifying the values and practices of each habitus in new and creative ways. The active negotiation of social conflict and blame enabled a minority of patients actively to divert blame from themselves and to develop and maintain critical healthcare evaluations.

[1]  O. Campbell,et al.  Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Kontos,et al.  The personal significance of home: habitus and the experience of receiving long-term home care. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[3]  V. Filippi,et al.  Maternity wards or emergency obstetric rooms? Incidence of near‐miss events in African hospitals , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[4]  Omar Lizardo,et al.  The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu's Habitus , 2004 .

[5]  C. Shilling.  Physical capital and situated action:a new direction for corporeal sociology , 2004 .

[6]  O. Voirol.  Reconnaissance et meconnaissance: sur la méconnaissance: theorie de la violence symbolique , 2004 .

[7]  V. Filippi,et al.  Responsiveness to life‐threatening obstetric emergencies in two hospitals in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire , 2004, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[8]  T. Ensor,et al.  Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. , 2004, Health policy and planning.

[9]  N. Crichton,et al.  Investigation of the ways in which patients' reports of their satisfaction with healthcare are constructed. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[10]  M. Strathern.  Introduction: new accountabilities : Anthropological studies in audit, ethics and the academy , 2003 .

[11]  Nick Crossley,et al.  From Reproduction to Transformation , 2003 .

[12]  D. Fassin.  Le capital social, de la sociologie à l'épidémiologie Analyse critique d'une migration transdisciplinaire , 2003 .

[13]  G. Williams,et al.  The determinants of health: structure, context and agency. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[14]  Terry Lovell,et al.  Resisting with Authority: Historical Specificity, Agency and the Performative Self , 2003 .

[15]  P. Virtanen,et al.  Older people in the field of medication. , 2002, Nursing older people.

[16]  M. Stewart,et al.  Whose evidence counts? An exploration of health professionals' perceptions of evidence-based practice, focusing on the maternity services. , 2001, Midwifery.

[17]  M. Oguttu,et al.  Maternal mortality in Kenya: the state of health facilities in a rural district. , 2001, East African medical journal.

[18]  V. Filippi,et al.  Giving birth in maternity hospitals in Benin: Testimonies of women , 2001, Reproductive health matters.

[19]  M. Shediac-Rizkallah,et al.  Women's experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity? , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Huw Davies,et al.  Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[21]  R. Hill,et al.  Improving Service Encounters through Resource Sensitivity: The Case of Health Care Delivery in an Appalachian Community , 1999 .

[22]  D. Healy,et al.  The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[23]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) , 1997 .

[24]  L. Gilson,et al.  Community satisfaction with primary health care services: an evaluation undertaken in the Morogoro region of Tanzania. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[25]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives , 1994 .

[26]  J. Litvack,et al.  User fees plus quality equals improved access to health care: results of a field experiment in Cameroon. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[27]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. , 1991, BMJ.

[28]  G. L. Weiss.  Patient Satisfaction with Primary Medical Care Evaluation of Sociodemographic and Predispositional Factors , 1988, Medical care.

[29]  J. Hibbard,et al.  Consumerism in Health Care: Prevalence and Predictors , 1987, Medical care.

[30]  C. Calhoun.  Habitus, field and capital , 2006 .

[31]  V. Filippi,et al.  Obstetric audit in resource-poor settings: lessons from a multi-country project auditing 'near miss' obstetrical emergencies. , 2004, Health policy and planning.

[32]  D. Fassin.  [Social capital, from sociology to epidemiology: critical analysis of a transfer across disciplines]. , 2003, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[33]  P. Pels.  The Trickster's Dilemma: Ethics and the Technologies of the Anthropological Self , 2000 .

[34]  J. Fortney,et al.  A framework for the evaluation of quality care in maternity services. , 2000 .

[35]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The Field of Cultural Production , 1993 .